How To Treat The Sewing Machinery Industry?

Indisputable form

As an inference hypothesis: a "sewing" system.

First of all, this is a mirror.

For the industry, including downstream industries and even the whole society, it can clearly reflect the competitive state of various enterprises in the sewing machinery industry.

Secondly, this is also a ruler.

For the industry, it provides a reference basis for horizontal comparison and becomes an important coordinate system for the comparison of the comprehensive strength of enterprises. It can be regarded as an extension of the competitiveness test of enterprises and an expansion of the stage of image presentation.

Again, this is another claim.

For the enterprise itself, it can be more intuitive and precise.

Self localization is conducive to avoid misjudgments caused by various subjective and non subjective factors, so as to facilitate a more objective understanding of self in this way.

In view of the above reasons, the guiding ideology of the association's decision to carry out the activities of "the top 20 enterprises in the industry" has been very clear: to create a competitive environment for competition with the help of merit and recommendation.

At the same time, the dynamic characteristics of this activity will also prove that the strong may not always be strong. In the process of strong and weak mutual pformation, a brilliant competition will be displayed, and this will accelerate the process of strong change in the whole industry.

Unreasonable fears

Whether the industry's top 20 enterprises can successfully launch and achieve the desired results depends not only on the positive and positive motives of the activity itself, but also on the coordination of various internal and external conditions.

Some enterprises hold a certain reservations about this activity, the reason is that they still have doubts about whether this condition is available or that they are worried about the negative effects of those abnormal factors on the result of the selection.

Historically, the activities of those who are "appraised" or "compared" have sometimes left some unsatisfactory traces.

Whether there is a survey, a product evaluation, an enterprise upgrading, etc., there have been several "happy few worries" phenomenon, and there are many kinds of complaints and accusations.

The reason is that most of these phenomena finally result from the process, that is, at the specific operational level.

To sum up, the causes of people's worries generally take the following three steps.

Whether the selection of items is reasonable or not is one of them.

The "20 strong" requires a comprehensive evaluation standard, that is, not necessarily big or strong, but also strong and strong. It is necessary to have a scientific and reasonable index system. This is the first step that must be carefully planned by the organizer of activities. It is necessary to set the keynote in order, neither too abstract nor too simple, and try to avoid starting from the beginning.

Whether the process of monitoring is fair or not is the second.

To ensure the fairness of the selection depends largely on the accuracy of the economic indicators, including the authority of data sources and the consistency of data collection caliber. This is an important part that organizers should pay attention to.

For enterprises, this has both an attitude problem and a technical problem of data processing.

For example, how diversified enterprises can accurately extract the total value of industrial output and corresponding profits and taxes of sewing machines from the consolidated statements, and how to avoid the possible discrepancy in the implementation of certain accounting systems and the unified definition of new product concepts between non-listed company and listed companies all need to be properly grasped.

Whether the selection of results is standardized is the third.

"The top 20" is

Although the "20 strong" election may not be perfect or even unavoidable, we should not overestimate the negative and negative effects that can be minimized or avoided.

Moreover, as time goes on, the activity itself can be gradually improved, perfected and improved in practice.

We believe that as long as we grasp the direction and take advantage of the situation, we will be able to make good use of our bad habits and achieve good expectations.

The core tip: "you sing me on the stage."

The selection of "top 50 business" in sewing machine industry has just come to a close, and the selection of "top 20 industrial enterprises" will start soon.

However, in view of the opinions expressed by some enterprises in the enlarged meeting of the eight six executive directors held in the early November, the industry still needs further consensus on this activity.

Combing various viewpoints and restoring the original intention of activities, it is necessary for us to discuss again the necessity and feasibility of "Appraising and recommending strong" activities around "whether to do", "how to do" and "why".

Indispensable guidance

The association entrusted the Secretariat with specific responsibility for the industry.

The first is a highly unified process and result.

The results are important, but the process can not be ignored.

From the industry perspective, this is a regular focus survey of the industrial structure, resource distribution and regional characteristics, which is conducive to identifying the market and clearing the industry.

The two is the high degree of unity between industry and enterprises.

The selection of the "top 20 industrial enterprises" is the starting point for the association to help and strengthen.

Through this activity, we aim to create a mechanism of self motivation for enterprises and enterprises.

In addition to the meticulous organization of trade associations, the key lies in fully mobilizing the enthusiasm of enterprises, requiring enterprises to participate actively, truthfully declare materials, actively cooperate with the judges, and rationally treat the results. The most important thing is to declare information in a truthful way, which is the basis of the whole selection activity and the premise of objective and impartial results.

Since data are so important, data must be provided with a serious attitude.

In this sense, before the list of top 20 "industrial enterprises", we must first test the integrity of the enterprise to avoid fraud.

Only in this way can we ensure the credibility of the election activities and maintain the authority of the election results.

In short, the selection of the "top 20 industrial enterprises" is in the industry.