[Industry Watch] Who Will Pay For Low Cost Killing Ecology?

Not long ago, a number of environmental agencies in China jointly released the other side of apple.

This incident has made many people reexamine the development experience since China's reform and opening up. Especially at the beginning of opening up, some experts predicted that when a good thing was introduced, several flies were normal.

But 30 years later, the harm caused by the pfer of polluting industries is beyond our expectation.

Attracting foreign investment is an important part of China's basic policy of opening to the outside world.

In the past 30 years since reform and opening up, China has become one of the largest foreign investment absorbing countries in the world, ranking the first in developing countries for nearly 20 years.

It should be noted that after the reform and opening up, some multinational corporations have played a positive role in environmental protection in China.

Their environmental protection level and consciousness are higher than those of domestic enterprises, especially by using FDI to pform some outdated and backward technology enterprises, reducing the consumption of raw materials and reducing pollution emissions.

However, a large number of foreign-funded enterprises have had a negative impact on China's environmental protection. Many multinational companies will pfer the highly polluting products that have been forbidden or severely restricted in their mother countries to China's production, thus passing on environmental pollution.

In recent years, FDI absorbed 20% of the total number of foreign-invested enterprises in China, and has become a huge source of pollution.

Therefore, with the increasing number of multinational companies, this has an increasingly large impact on China's environmental protection and sustainable development.

In fact, this kind of behavior, called the pursuit of low-cost killing of the earth's ecology by the French media, is not only a disease in developing countries, but also in developed countries themselves.

While condemning the pfer of production from developed countries to low-cost developing countries, the French media also accused developing countries of pursuing a profit without polluting the environment, and calling for a halt to the pursuit of low-cost production models.

It has been found that developed countries and regions including the European Union and the United States play an exemplary role in suppressing the greenhouse effect. China, India and other countries have been condemned and become the negative models of destroying the ecosystem.

This simplification of global issues has ignored a key point, that is, India and China emit greenhouse gases because they are producing toys for the developed countries, producing clothing and planting vegetables for the developed countries.

The pursuit of low cost crazy motives not only shifted the industry, but also shifted the pollution of developed countries.

It is undeniable that the pfer of polluting industries is becoming an important issue of China's environmental pollution.

Experts believe that the pfer of polluting industries is mainly due to the existence of industrial differences, cost benefits and environmental standards.

As the global economy continues to develop towards integration and regionalization, inter state

At present, our country is facing a major strategic opportunity to further develop international industries and achieve leaping development.

Seizing this opportunity will enable our country to participate in the optimal allocation of international resources in a wider range, deeper level and higher level, speed up the upgrading and upgrading of traditional industries, accelerate the introduction and innovation of high-tech industries, and effectively enhance the competitiveness of industries and the quality of economic operation.

However, from the analysis of experts, we can see that in the process of undertaking these international industrial pfer, we will also bring pollution sources into China, increasing the cost of environmental pollution, even higher than China's interests.

Therefore, in the process of introducing foreign capital and technology, undertaking industrial pfer and increasing employment, the government can formulate flexible import measures according to the changes in the world economic environment and the changes in the domestic economic conditions.

When the foreign investment industry does contain high technology, the technology can improve the pollution problems caused by the domestic environment and enterprises' own production process, and bring benefits to the national economy. We can undertake the industry through joint ventures or technology pfer. If the pollution cost of multinational companies is too high, we can impose a strict environmental access system such as high tariffs to limit the pfer of polluting industries.

In addition, the difference of environmental standards is also an important reason for promoting the pfer of polluting industries.

Therefore, it is imminent to establish and perfect the environmental standard system in our country, intensify environmental protection, break the segmented environmental governance mode, realize the regional environmental coordination, and timely launch the environmental vertical management system.

In short, the low cost of killing the ecosystem can not be paid by all developing countries like ours, but also to the developed countries.