Nike Sued Employees For Breach Of Competition Obligations
Recently,
Nike
Sports (China) Limited believed that its original employee, Zhao, violated the obligation of competition restriction and brought it to court.
Beijing
The people's Court of Dongcheng District municipality has formally accepted the case.
Nike claims that Zhao Mouyuan is the marketing manager of Nike department in charge of cooperation with athletes and individual sports associations.
Due to its working relationship, Zhao contacted and held many important information and business secrets of Nike, including the business information of important athletes and associations that had a cooperative relationship with Nike.
To this end, the two sides have signed "
Confidentiality agreement
"And" competition restriction agreement "stipulated that when Zhao worked in Nike company and expired, he would not disclose and disclose any commercial secrets of Nike company. Zhao could not provide any services to Nike's competitors in any way within 12 months after he terminated or terminated his labor relationship with Nike, and the company would pay compensation to the defendant, Zhao, according to law.
In February 2008, Zhao resigned on the grounds of personal reasons. In February 2008, he agreed to leave the company. In March, he had explicitly requested that he perform the obligation of limitation of business within 6 months of his resignation (the time limit was less than the agreed time limit), and paid him a 126 thousand yuan of compensation for competition restriction, which is equivalent to 6 months' full wages.
However, according to Nike's complaint, it was recently learned that Zhao worked in Nike's main competitor, Adidas (China) Limited, and engaged in many commercial activities for the commercial interests of Adidas.
In April 2008, Adidas paid social insurance for Zhao.
Nike believes that the confidentiality agreement and the competition restriction agreement signed by the company with Zhao are legal and effective, but Zhao's behavior violates the agreed obligations and seriously damages the legitimate rights and interests of Nike.
Therefore, he brought a lawsuit to the Dongcheng District court and requested the court's judgment to confirm that the defendant's act infringes upon the commercial secrets in violation of the competition restriction obligation, and orders the defendant to continue to perform the obligation of limitation of business and return the 126 thousand yuan to the plaintiff for the limitation of competition.
- Related reading
Yao Ming Sued Yao Ming For A 1 Million Generation Of Sports Shoes Manufacturers.
|- Communication | 5 Types Of People In The Workplace Are Not Suitable For Deep Friendship.
- Workplace planning | How To Get Out Of The Low Tide Of Work
- Personnel and labour | Did You Itch For Workplace "Seven Year Itch"?
- Marketing manual | Clothing Marketing: Don't Take Too Much, Easy To Press Goods.
- Management treasure | Beginners Must Know 12 "Hidden Rules" When They Open Stores.
- Fashion item | Shaping The Elegant Winter Streets With Elegant Elegance
- Accounting teller | 預算:業務預算和創新預算
- Mall Express | Taobao Will Duplicate The Mobile Version Of Double 11 To Open The 38 Crazy O2O Mode.
- asset management | Get Rid Of The Constraints Of Calendar Year And Financial Year.
- Office attire | Do You Want To Wear A Suit On The First Day Of Work?
- Interview With Fashion Designer Lv Yue
- Zohra Brand Success
- The Number Of EU Textile And Garment Products Recalled To China Is Increasing.
- Electricity Supplier Purchase Network Ushered In Gold Promotional Period Sales Of Shoes And Clothing Rose Sharply
- Chongqing'S First Professional Clothing Material Wholesale Market Opened In Beijing
- Some Franchisees Jointly Complained To The Shanghai Government About Daphne.
- India Textile Delegation Visits Sri Lanka To Strengthen Textile And Clothing Trade Between The Two Countries
- India'S Textile Industry Is In Great Trouble.
- Indonesia Injected 110 Billion Rupee Revival Textile Machinery Industry
- Cotton Good Factor Will Gradually Disappear. Proportion Of Fabric To Cotton Is Reduced.