Home >

Leadership Reflection: Why Are Leaders Busy With Employees?

2014/2/12 20:00:00 549

??? 日本語 Fran?ais English 中文

The six months ago, they had been beaten by the reality, and they had been attacked by the reality. The planning and reform were basically not promoted, basically the original one was in operation. The so-called new product listing was discussed many times, and the marketing department still failed to come up with a feasible plan. The cost management system of the channel dealers had made some changes, but was challenged by the < a href= "http://www.91se91.com/news/list.aspx ClassID=101112107102" > the finance department < /a >, and still received the complaints from the distributors. The enthusiasm of the salesmen started at the beginning, but somehow, what reason did they know? Now they are pushing back to the original track! Zhang P is finally in hospital. Pressure, busyness and helplessness make it impossible for him to take over the marketing system for half a year, as a marketing manager of a fast moving consumer goods company.
... 
 above, many enterprises in China appear, and even if they are fully committed, they will put their lives on the job. Even if they are full of grievances, they will still be confused. Why are employees so indifferent?! 
 < a > href= > http://www.91se91.com/news/list.aspx > ClassID=101112107105 > enterprise leader < /a > busy employee leisure. Why? What should I do?!
 the core problem is that the goal is not decomposed thoroughly. /p >
 Case: .
Song P took his BMW car to the front line of business to see the progress of the first tier market and see if he needs support in specific matters for this month's goals. 
 you should not think that he is busy, worried, pressed by the task and forced. In fact, the real reason is that he is idle in the office! 
 he is the boss of a certain area in Coca-Cola. This is my favorite event during the Sales Department of Coca Cola Co. Because he comes to the first-line market, we can not only chat, but also communicate with leaders in another environment, and enable leaders to truly understand the market and truly promote business growth. 
 why the greater the international giants of foreign enterprises are, the more idle leaders are? Why are they so idle? 
 actually, they are not idle. Their work is really based on the rule of spanaction development, and is based on the work objectives, processes, management rhythm and responsibilities at all levels, so that employees in different stages and different levels have different jobs. Their work is often in the front end of strategic planning and process management, and these management is only the basic strategic planning plan, organization, command, supervision and control. The leader of Coca Cola Co has broken down the company's business objectives (i.e., no longer decomposing) into every person, every time, every product, every customer and every region, and has made annual, quarterly and monthly strategy formulation, cost decomposition and personnel execution steps matching for each target. It has entered the command, supervision and control phase from the planning stage to the organizational stage, so that each piece is the most complicated or the most specific thing. Seen above, it happened to be in the stage of supervision and control. Of course, it seemed like "idle" to "loitering"! 
 in contrast, many business leaders, because of the lack of logic and structurization of management, failed to sort out the work under their jurisdiction. As a result, they were planning from year to end, and from year to end, they were doing the goal decomposition. From the end of the year to the end of the year, they were doing supervision and control. They were doing fire fighting work from beginning to end. Can they not die?! 
 a lot of leaders who are dying to die, you might as well think: if your business goal is not completely broken down to every specific business conduct of every business person, then your work arrangement is not in place. If the work objective is not arranged, then, is the job of the first line business possible or not? If it does not have the support of the company's policies and programmes, then is it possible to discount his achievement? If he has not been trained to achieve the basic skills needed to achieve the goal, is it possible to have another performance discount? In this way, all your instructions and arrangements can be pushed away after a few discounts. Finally, all the monkeys are actually back on their shoulders!!! /p.
 executive ability is not enough, in fact, the ability of management is not > /strong > /p >
 Case: .
The success of "P > snowflake beer is said by many to be the power of capital and the success of the acquisition. As a former manager, I agree that it is the embodiment of management in place and execution, so that its national integration and national replication can be successful. In the case of the economic downturn in 2012, no beer company has been able to continue to acquire and build factories. (the final case of the purchase of Jinwei beer by Yanjing Beer, which has been so popular, has ended in a bleak ending), and snowflake beer can also set up factories in Henan and Hunan, or even a million ton level. It shows that there must be some real success factors! 
P once had a very impressive experience. After I jumped from professional managers to do consulting, I was visiting the vice president of national marketing of snowflake beer (that is, my former supervisor). We chatted in the office for a whole day. From the beginning to the end, we did not see his work of receiving electricity, meeting, sending mail and so on. While I was working at snowflake, I saw with a view that the staff work was in good order. When the tension was tight (such as the annual budget in nine and October), it was very tense, and when we should not be nervous, everyone's work was still in place and effective! 
 an enterprise has no outside strategy, strategy, execution and management. The strategy has been basically formed in the previous year, and the strategy has also been presupposed in advance. Then the left is a href= "http://www.91se91.com/news/list.aspx ClassID=101112107107" > execution and management < /a >. After having a goal, management is the establishment of the system, the carding of the process, the design of the organization, the determination of personnel, and the landing of the examination. Enterprise leadership is very busy, in addition to the objectives of the formulation of problems, the formulation of the lack or flow of form, process is not clear, the department or function conflict, organization mismatch, the responsibility of the personnel is not clear, the assessment is not examined to the point, all are the important reasons for the busy staff to be idle. 
 because of the above factors, many enterprises do not know where to start, and their inner foundation can not be separated from management. Leaders can not catch the slack of their slack work, so only the leaders themselves have done it! 
When p was training in Erie, he put forward a concept called "standing business". That's exactly what it means. In short, I think that management and implementation of problems should be the problem of leadership or headquarters. As a front line, they are more about implementation, and what to do and how to execute, and what leaders should do before, after, and after the implementation of the line should be very clear!