199 Yuan TOTOBOBO Mask Is Equivalent To 1 Yuan Non-Woven Mask.

According to the results released by China Consumers Association, the protective effect of this test is divided into five levels, the highest is five stars, the price of 199 yuan "TOTOBOBO" can be replaced by cotton filter rubber mask, and the price only 1 yuan "Bao Kang POWECOM" dust respirator (disposable folding mask), the filtering effect is the same, only for Samsung half. But in terms of respiratory resistance, the mask of 199 yuan is not as comfortable as 1 yuan. The "haze survival manual" for the TOTOBOBO mask evaluation conclusion is that the face fits perfectly without leakage. The filter core has a 96% filtration rate effect on PM0.3, and the color change of filter elements can directly display air pollution.

　　 Network evaluation is very numerous. Only professional organizations can test the data to ensure the authenticity of the data.

The MFA's mask comparison test was commissioned by the national labor insurance products quality supervision and Inspection Center (Beijing), referring to the testing method of the related performance of the respirator for respirators and respirators in accordance with the GB2626-2006 respirator. The evaluation of "haze Survival Handbook" has clearly pointed out that the material, design rationality and use experience of the product are evaluated without data test, and the evaluation index that it has chosen is enough to identify a mask's "body". In this way, there is no need to repeat what credibility is strong or weak.

　　 Imported goods must be labeled in Chinese.

Aside from the protection effect, TOTOBOBO has long been pointed out that there is no Chinese label on the packaging, which is "pseudo import three no products". But even so, it can not prevent its sales volume soaring after the recommended haze survival manual. From the Taobao index, TOTOBOBO was recommended by the Handbook, and from 40 in early 13 to TOP10 rapidly. The domestic brands criticized by the manual have been affected to varying degrees. In contrast, the interests of consumers are even more impaired, not only for the loss of profits of 199 yuan, but also for the incalculable health loss caused by the ineffective protection of such products. But are the beneficiaries really just TOTOBOBO makers?

　　 Be vigilant against pseudo public organizations selling disguised face masks in disguised form

A WeChat public account, which calls itself "public good", is an unprotected, illegal import and expensive mask endorsement. It's really puzzling. I'm afraid that "benefit from it" can give its best explanation. There is a legend in the bookshop that "haze survival manual" has been directly and indirectly working with TOTOBOBO on the day of birth. Although no exact evidence has been shown, speculation about the "interest exchange" behind the recommendation is not necessarily groundless.

The masses who are unaware of the truth are surrounded by their overwhelming promotion, puzzled by the "eloquence" of facts, regarded as an expert in anti haze, confided in their needs, recommended and completely deceived, and even the authoritative media have been deceived. Sa Beining, a CCTV star host, made an exclusive interview with the haze survival manual not long ago. In addition, he wore TOTOBOBO masks with poor protective effect in the program. Under the unknown circumstances, he promoted the propaganda of "haze survival manuals" to publicize the publicity of TOTOBOBO and misled consumers' choice of haze protection products.

After the MFA announced the data of the mask comparison test, many fans of "haze survival manual" had doubts about the recommendation of TOTOBOBO masks. They only wrote a "recent wave of black TOTOBOBO articles", and still disguised as a loyal fan of TOTOBOBO, praising their protective effects, believing that they believe Singapore's products. The effect of PM2.5 protective products can not be judged by personal experience or information about product official website description, production place, and so on. In the face of such recommendations as "haze Survival Handbook", consumers need to be cautious.