Partial Stock Fund Continued To Slightly Reduce Positions 10 Funds Lighten Up 2%.

This week, the fund continued to reduce its position slightly.

Although the central bank once again released loose liquidity signals this week, it is difficult to resist the "blood pumping" effect of the new stock purchase, while continuing the negative impact of the previous economic data. The three quarter GDP data released this week once again verify that the current economy is at a "bottom hovering and limited recovery" pattern; the policy side is relatively heavy with relatively few news, plus the delay in Shanghai and Hong Kong, making the market more negative emotions.

The continued downturn in the economy and the wait-and-see of the reform policy prompted fund managers to become more cautious and more active.

Direction fund positions: the overall position declined slightly, and the initiative changed slightly.

The October 23rd position calculation data showed that the stock position fund declined slightly this week.

The weighted average position of the comparable active equity fund was 85.26%, down 0.47% from the previous week; the weighted average position of the equity hybrid fund was 79.09%, down 0.59% compared with the previous week; and the weighted average position of the hybrid fund was 67.56%, which was 0.56% lower than that of the previous week.

During the calculation period, the Shanghai and Shenzhen 300 index fell 1.98%, and the positions changed slightly.

After deducting the change of passive positions, the partial equity fund continued to slightly reduce its position.

Partial debt direction

Positions: stock positions also declined.

Among them, the weighted average position of the guaranteed fund is 10.23%, which is 0.64% lower than that of the previous week; the weighted average stock position of the bond fund is 4.89%, which is 0.43% lower than that of the previous week; the weighted average position of the mixed debt fund is 17.62%, which is 1.12% lower than that of the previous week.

Different scale fund positions: all scale fund positions have declined slightly.

In the three category of partial equity oriented active funds, the weighted average position of large funds is 83.23%, which is 0.5% lower than that of the previous week.

The average weighted average position of medium sized funds is 83.26%, down 0.48% from the previous week.

The average weighted average position of small funds is 79.26%, down 0.55% from the previous week.

The number of funds increased or reduced: almost no fund was increased this week.

From the perspective of specific funds, there is no obvious increase or reduction in the fund this week.

After deducting the change of passive positions, 1 funds increased their holdings by more than 2%, of which no fund took up more than 5% of the shares. At the same time, 10 funds took the initiative to reduce their positions by more than 2%.

Fund position level distribution: the proportion of heavily loaded funds continues to decline.

Heavy position Fund (position >85%) accounted for 39.77%, 2.01% less than that of the previous week; the heavier position Fund (position 75%~85%) accounted for 24.33%, accounting for an increase of 1.17%; the median position Fund (position 60%~75%) accounted for 17.95%, accounting for an increase of 0.67%; the position was lighter or light duty fund accounted for 17.95%, an increase of 0.17%.

The operation of branch positions: multi fund companies continue to reduce their positions slightly, and operate more uniformly.

From the perspective of specific fund companies, this week, except for some new fund companies such as New York Bank and Huabao Xingye, the rest of them were reduced, and the direction of operation was more consistent.

In terms of large fund companies, Huaxia, Jiashi and Nanfang fund companies have relatively slightly reduced positions, while fund companies such as Boshi and Yi Fangda have lighten their positions slightly. Large and medium sized fund companies, such as Peng Hua, Huaxing and huitianfu, have mostly chosen to reduce their positions slightly.

Among them, Zhejiang merchants, Jin Ying, Tian Zhi, Nong Yin Hui Li and so on this week slightly reduced the warehouse slightly, the Bank of China, Bao Ying, Guo Lian an, Hai Fu Tong and other funds reduced the margin slightly.

From the perspective of specific funds, there are no obvious characteristics. The growth and operation of blue chip style funds are all divided. The larger margin is the more active and flexible fund of the operation style. The larger margin is the fund with stable operation style and preference for the concept investment.