Vague Brands Such As Infants And Children, And UNIQLO Are Also Illegal.

In Xidan joy shop H&M shop, the reporter found that here sells a model of 90/56 (height / chest) top coat, does not have "baby supplies" the word, simultaneously nominal B.

Xinhua Department Store in Xinjiekou

The store found that an underwear labeled "80/48" was also tagged as "B", and the label was written on the label.

In addition to production enterprises, in large scale

WAL-MART, the reporter found that it sells a baby girl's cotton padded clothes, the model label is "100/50", the label is the baby product, but the same type of product label on the same type "A" type has been erased by the correction fluid, but can not find other grade words.

As for the specific reasons, the staff are not clear.

For these

Production and sale of infant clothing products, Guo Wensong said that even if the label is qualified, it does not necessarily mean that the product is qualified.

The logo of these large enterprises is not qualified, and only this point can be concluded that the products are not qualified. As for whether the harmful substances exceed the standard, they need professional testing to know.

But no matter what the result is, consumers will not be able to see such products.

Reporters noted that in real life there are still some 2 year old babies who grow up fast and have to choose 100 centimeters or more. However, 100 centimeters of children's clothing can be implemented according to the national standard, so that mothers worry that the content of hazardous substances in products may bring harm to children who are still infants.

Some shrewd enterprises obviously have not let go of such business opportunities.

Reporter found in H&M, a model of 110/56 "children's knitted jacket", marking the implementation of the safety technical standard is B, but it is also known as 2-4 years old children.

There are many clothes that are labeled like this. Besides H&M, ZARA also has such labels.

Since the product claims that the scope of the population includes 2 year old infants between -3 years old, is it illegal to implement the standard non a class? Is there any suspicion that the enterprise has the loopholes in the national standard?

"From the consumer's psychological point of view, this understanding is reasonable, but according to the national standard, it is not illegal for businesses to label so, because the age group is an additional markup", Guo Wensong said. The national standard solves the general problem. There are always some special groups that are difficult to cover. Consumers can have targeted choices. The testing center also finds that there are some enterprises in the market, and their 0-6 year old infants and young children wear all kinds of clothing standards, and even some adult clothing.

Reporters found yesterday at Le friend's children's clothing store in Sanyuanqiao, including the underwear, jacket, trousers, gloves, socks, hats and other 0-6 year old products are indeed labeled "category a", "baby products" words; shop sales of some maternity wear is also implemented a class standards.

"Enterprise implementation is higher than the national standard of enterprise standards, this is the enterprise's autonomous self-discipline behavior, it can certainly enhance the market competitiveness", Guo Wensong also stressed, but the enterprise promised to implement the class a standard for the children's wear that can be implemented B class standard 100 cm above, and if it is detected that it has reached B class but has not reached the class a standard, it is also illegal.