Frequent Job Hopping Is A Potential Killer In Your Career.

"...

Job hopping is a new trend.

In my opinion, if the applicant works for a company for more than 10 years, he will leave a bad impression on the interviewer.

Obviously, they will ask, why? Are they not courageous to find new opportunities? Or are they used to being comfortable with the status quo? So, candidates have noticed that if you work in a company for more than 10 years, you may think of it as a symbol of loyalty, but it can also be an obstacle to further development of your career.

With all due respect, I totally disagree with this view.

But Jeanne's argument is supported by statistics: according to the report issued by the Bureau of labor statistics, the average length of work of the salaried employees in the same company is 4.6 years.

This is a bad trend.

The HR reminds you that many people change jobs for two years. They are considered to be frequent job hopping. Frequent job hopping is like telling the next employer.

The work is too difficult.

Facing the challenge of work is not the quality that bosses appreciate.

If there are challenges in your job, do your best to improve yourself. You can take the initiative to ask for training or classes to train your skills, but don't lose heart or walk away.

Work is too boring.

Although boring work is a big taboo for your career, it shouldn't be an excuse for your leaving.

At least you should try some other positions inside the company. As long as you ask for applications, there are many things you can do in the company.

Bad interpersonal relations.

If your character is out of tune with company culture, it's another thing to say. But if your job hopping is just a quarrel with a colleague or a boss, you should reflect on it.

You know, it's better to think about the cause of a quarrel if you can't take a beating.

For the sake of money.

It is wrong to change jobs frequently just to raise wages.

If job hopping is to raise wages, then in the long run, you will find that the result is not as good as yours.

In my view, the only way of career development is job hopping. This widely accepted argument is totally unreliable.

For example, in 2004, I saved a company that was closing down. Now I am the person in charge of this company.

The number of employees has increased from 6 people 8 years ago to 100 today, with a turnover rate of only 2%.

And I will work there all my life.

When I received a call from VC, I told them that "the only way out for me, my partner Mary Michel Scott and other shareholders is death, so our company is not suitable for you."

All the management and most employees in our company think they will work in their company for the rest of their lives.

As a boss, I really want to retain my abilities.

But as an employee, I think it's better to work hard in a company instead of job hopping, which is a more reasonable choice for your salary and skills.

If you keep looking at the "perfect job", you will miss the better development opportunities in your current position.

So, I want to say sorry to Jeanne and all those who support the idea of "job hopping", because I will put forward a new view that you should work in the same company for more than 10 years. Here are 10 reasons for supporting my view.

1. resume is more experienced.

If you work long enough in a company, you will probably become a senior employee in the company, so you don't have to start from scratch to compete for promotion opportunities in the new company.

2. more opportunities for management.

The more senior staff, the more chance to lead the team and guide the new people who come from job hopping.

The longer you work, the better your ability will be. This will increase the trust and loyalty of your team members, and they will naturally support you as leader of the team.

In this way, you don't have to be like a job hopper to maintain the leadership position through appointments in the new company.

3. increase stability.

If you worry all the year round

It is unlikely that a long-term plan will be worked out.

The stability of occupation and work will help you more effectively solve the pressure you will encounter in the future.

4., stable homes and more.

。

Job hoppers have to pay more loans and get fewer pensions.

Every change of work means moving. That means paying a lot of property paction costs every time, unless it is moved to a more livable place, otherwise it is not an ideal choice.

Stability is also easier to borrow, and banks prefer borrowers with at least two years of steady work.

Frequent job hopping also affects the 401K clause plan.

So, although job hoppers think that jumping to the new company will get a signing bonus or a raise, but in the long run, getting more equity incentives and keeping pension accounts is a good choice.