The Wisdom Of "Sandwich Cake" That Workplace People Have To Know

"Sandwich cookies" should learn to focus on the work itself.

The disagreement between superiors and superiors, the clear-cut relationship between colleagues and colleagues, the indifference between superiors and subordinates, and being in the workplace, presumably everyone has experienced this helpless "splint" encounter more or less, and most of them are most puzzled that they can not think of a "best plan" to preserve their interpersonal relationship. But experts say that if you fail to become a "Sandwich Cookie" in the workplace, you should try to learn to focus on the work itself instead of trying to figure out the complicated relationship.

In fact, in many cases, such a "splint" environment can well detect a person's professional self-confidence. When repeated revisions can not be recognized by the two leaders at the same time, the inferiority will be regarded as a negation of their superiors' ability to work and passive burnout, while a confident person will regard it as a common disagreement and a peaceful treatment. The mentality is different, and the result is different.

Experts suggest that this type of sandwich cookies should strengthen face-to-face communication with the two leaders. On the one hand, we should not allow unnecessary confusion of information in the process of chaotic transmission. On the other hand, we should not allow employees to analyze the leadership relationship far beyond the scope of work. Instead, we should learn to seize the most important contradictions at the moment and make the completion of the work the most important premise.

"Sandwich biscuit" should avoid relying on the "sense of security" of the group

Although the mindset of work concentration will offset some of the vacant and self doubt due to speculation on the ground, but as a sandwich cookie in the workplace, almost everyone has an instinctive psychological need for "collectives" to seek a sense of belonging and security, which makes some people in a dilemma between different factions. Liu Tiegang told reporters that the case of A Hua and Fu Gang is exactly the same on the crux of the problem.

A Hua, as an ordinary employee who struggles and accumulates resources in the company, expects to repay and express his gratitude to his mentor. On the one hand, he is unwilling to destroy his deep colleagues' affection. However, when the people around them were thrown into their respective support groups due to their subjective consciousness, value standards and personal feelings, A Hua's sense of "lonely people" immediately came to life. This kind of sandwich cookies, which lingers among colleagues, tends to focus on emotional tendencies and positions. work In the end, they make the wrong decisions.

And the "plywood" situation like Fu Gang is in the situation. middle managers This is even more common. This kind of person is often accompanied by the uneasiness of "unable to get to the bottom of the day", for fear that careless carelessness is not to offend the boss or to leave the masses, but because of the restraint of working status, it is bound to fail to integrate into any group completely.

Experts say Workplace "Sandwich biscuits" should try to avoid relying on the group's "sense of security". Although exclusion of separatism and seeking sense of belonging are human instincts, this psychological complex will largely limit objective thinking and judgment, and make people entangled in work and emotional entanglement all the time, even more tired.

The highest state of "sandwich biscuits" is "splint" instead of "gas".

Speaking of how to look at the "sandwich cookies" in the workplace, experts say that the so-called sandwich cookies are actually describing an embarrassing living condition constrained by "sandwich".

But he clearly pointed out that in the fierce competition, the situation in the workplace, struggling with the "splint" environment is actually a very normal thing. After all, the workplace is made up of "people". Different values and different starting points will lead to complex contradictions which are totally different from each other. There is absolutely no ideal situation for "splint".

But the same as "splint", "Qi" and "no gas" actually vary from person to person. These three words can be divided into two parts to be understood separately. The first is the "splint", that is, the conflict between the two concepts, and then the "Qi", that is, a series of emotional reactions caused by the awareness of crisis after the perception of the conflict itself. Therefore, the same "splint" of different "people" may produce entirely different results: some people are struggling to suppress, because they can not exert their ability and feel depressed; some people are at a loss, in the face of choice, they are in a dilemma, deviating from their work; others simply suffer from both sides, all day long, bitter and bitter, and indignant.

In view of this kind of individual differentiation of "sandwich", this actually puts forward higher psychological requirements for everyone in the workplace: or you are willing to sink and escape, making it a curse that hinders personal development, or you choose to look at peace and make it a powerful force to focus on work and inspire potential. Therefore, do not complain about the "helplessness" of the helpless, "sandwich biscuits" the highest state is "splint" rather than "gas".