Home >

Leather Processing Promotes The Development Of Animal Husbandry In China, Which Is In Line With The Interests Of The State Without Hindering Environmental Protection.

2015/8/4 7:03:00 42

Leather Processing Fur Leather Manufacturing

In recent decades, though China's

Leather manufacturing industry

Development is very fast, but increasingly serious environmental problems have become one of the bottlenecks restricting the development of leather industry in China.

As we all know, the leather industry has strong destructive power to the environment, and a large amount of chemical materials will be used in the leather making process.

(

Heavy metal chromium

)

It costs a lot of water resources.

;

The production of waste wool, waste fat, a large number of high concentration organic wastewater and foul smell of the exhaust gas will have a very negative impact on the surrounding environment, and its harm often takes more than ten years or even longer to eliminate.

stay

Many leather industry experts and scholars in our country think that raw leather processing is a part of seriously polluting the environment. Even the import of raw leather to domestic processing is to bring pollution to China.

Curse

To China.

It's not in fact.

Undeniable

Leather processing

It is a heavy pollution industry. It needs to be processed by processing a raw cowhide into finished leather.

One

More than tonnes of sewage, enterprises need to invest a lot of money in sewage treatment.

As a result, some leather processing enterprises began to pform, instead of processing raw cowhide, instead of directly buying blue wet cowhide from abroad, and then processing it into finished leather, which would greatly reduce sewage discharge.

But what we need to know is that raw skins are very valuable resources in any country, even the large producers of raw skins all over the world.

The United States has issued a series of policies and measures to encourage the original leather to remain in the United States for further processing, and to further tannate the wet blue and then increase its added value.

Because the profit of raw leather processing is greater, only when the output of raw leather exceeds the tanning capacity of the United States, or when tanning leather is no longer profitable in the United States, will the United States be willing to do so?

Raw skin outlet

。

From this we can see that the United States is so strong that the countries that are so strict in environmental protection leave the original leather processing as far as possible in the country.

Curse

It's just some people's ignorance.

As for the added value, the tannery industry's finished product price is original leather.

Two

Three

Times, gross margins are generally

15%-25%

It is far higher than the general industry.

Our neighbours, such as Japan, South Korea, India, Thailand, Pakistan and other countries all have a tax exemption policy on raw leather imports, while our country has made a policy of importing raw leather tax protection to stop it.

Curse

The harm is really puzzling.

In addition, China is a country with a shortage of resources. It is a basic national policy to import large quantities of raw materials and manufactured goods, and it is also in line with national interests.

In addition, many people think that restricting the importation of raw materials can protect our livestock industry, which is also a wrong understanding.

On the contrary, leather processing can greatly promote the development of animal husbandry in China, because the stronger the tannery ability, the better development of animal husbandry.

This is a win-win situation.

If we impose heavy taxes and restrict imports, only the leather industry will be in trouble. Not only can we not protect domestic animal husbandry, but it will also affect the normal sale of raw cattle skin.

In fact, from the perspective of the development of leather industry for many years, the leather industry in China can be integrated with the international market, and the technology is progresses through the continuous import of raw leather.

Although this concept of patriotic motivation is commendable, it is far from reality and is harmful to China.

Just as our country's color TV sets do not cause China's products to be in trouble because of the opening of foreign products, the opposite is true. In the face of fierce market competition, the technology level and international competitiveness of China's TV products have been greatly enhanced, making China go to the ranks of Exporting Countries with the power of video cameras.