Three Mistaken Ideas Of Entrepreneurship Policy

The theory of entrepreneurial endowments is not desirable.

Entrepreneurship requires not only good entrepreneurial environment and policies, but entrepreneurship education also helps to improve the success rate of entrepreneurial activities. Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial activities have become an important driving force in the new era of global economy. A strong wave of entrepreneurship has been launched worldwide.

In our country, the rapid development of private economy and private enterprises has aroused people's attention to entrepreneurial activities and entrepreneurial spirit. Solving practical problems such as employment, University Students' Entrepreneurship and the construction of an innovative country has further strengthened the concern about entrepreneurship. Creating an entrepreneurial economy and building an entrepreneurial society has become a loud slogan.

As a whole, China's entrepreneurial activities are active, survival oriented entrepreneurship is dominant, entrepreneurial motivation is strong, entrepreneurial skills are low, and the entrepreneurial environment has gradually improved, but it still needs to be improved. "Three major erroneous zones" should be the focus of our entrepreneurial environment construction and the formulation of entrepreneurial policy.

One of the misconceptions: first, pay attention to the investment environment and despise the entrepreneurial environment. In the initial stage of reform and opening up, all over the world, in order to attract foreign investment, pay much attention to the construction of the investment environment and pay little attention to the construction of the entrepreneurial environment.

Later, because of the contribution of private economy and private enterprises, they began to attach importance to and try to encourage entrepreneurial activities.

In order to attract entrepreneurs to stay at home or stay in local businesses, all localities have taken measures to establish economic and technological development zones, science and technology parks, set up enterprise incubation centers, attract overseas students to return to business, and so on. The main measures taken are concentrated on lowering the cost of starting businesses, or even "giving", giving gifts, such as free provision of office conditions, tax relief and so on.

Unfortunately, such a policy has not achieved very good results.

The price of land in a region is cheap, labor is cheap, the government does not collect taxes, but there is no service, and the purchasing power of consumers is low. Entrepreneurs in such an environment can hardly have good prospects for development.

In addition, such policies are easy to imitate. If you give preferential treatment, I can give more concessions, which will easily trigger a price war similar to that between enterprises and do not have a competitive advantage.

Such entrepreneurial environment may increase the proportion of surviving entrepreneurship, but it is not conducive to cultivating innovative enterprises.

Entrepreneurs with entrepreneurial spirit are more concerned about growth potential and development opportunities.

With the high cost of land and labor, the development of SMEs in Hongkong is very good. The key reason is that the government of Hongkong has provided strong support for entrepreneurs and SMEs in terms of infrastructure, human resources development, technological support, quality support, environmental support, information disclosure, market development and financing.

At present, the cost of land, wages and even raw materials and other production factors in southern China is higher than that in the north, but entrepreneurial activities in the south are still much more active than in the north.

It can be seen that the construction of entrepreneurial environment should be shifted from reducing the cost of starting an undertaking to reducing costs and increasing profits, and gradually increasing the entrepreneurial income.

Misunderstanding two: the success or failure of entrepreneurship depends mainly on the endowment conditions of entrepreneurs. For a long time, people have always believed that the success of entrepreneurship depends mainly on the endowments of entrepreneurs. This view has also been prevalent in academia. Since the reform and opening up, the objective fact that many low level entrepreneurs have been successful has reinforced this view. The government once attached importance to creating entrepreneurial environment from the perspective of reducing the cost of entrepreneurship.

In fact, endowments determinism is mainly due to the complex process of entrepreneurial activities, and the study of business activities for a long time is mainly concerned with large enterprises, focusing on the survival and development of existing enterprises.

Since the 80s of the 20th century, entrepreneurship research and entrepreneurship education in 20 have also started to boom, and many world-renowned institutions such as Harvard Business School and Walton business school have set up a series of entrepreneurship courses.

According to the global entrepreneurship watch survey, over 1500 4 year universities and colleges in the United States have offered entrepreneurship courses, and the number is continuing to increase.

Entrepreneurship education and training can help entrepreneurs understand the general law of enterprise creation and growth, understand some obstacles and risks that may be encountered, and improve the success rate of entrepreneurial activities.

The China report on global entrepreneurship watch (GEM) released by Tsinghua University in 2004 shows that in 2004, the ratio of Chinese entrepreneurship index (that is, the number of people engaged in Entrepreneurship in the age of 18 to 64) was 13.7%, ranking fifth in the 35 surveyed countries or regions of the world.

In view of active entrepreneurial activities, the government should create conditions to promote entrepreneurship education and training.

We can adopt the operation mode of "working capital", that is, part of the government's funds will be used as a development fund to support research centers or service providers to provide "public products and services" to the majority of entrepreneurs, such as free lectures, general consultation and information services.

At the same time, these research centers or service providers can not rely solely on the government's capital input. They must earn their income by providing special services so as to maintain the normal operation of the institutions.

With the enhancement of the viability and competitiveness of the service institutions, the government can gradually reduce or even stop capital investment.

Misunderstanding three: entrepreneurship policy is equivalent to SME policy. In the process of building entrepreneurial environment, the difference and connection between entrepreneurial policy and SME policy is worth noticing.

The focus of entrepreneurship policy is to create an entrepreneurial environment and seek the matching of entrepreneurial opportunities and entrepreneurial capabilities.

The focus of the SME policy is to help expand and grow new businesses with growth potential and desire through a series of measures.

From this point of view, the policy of entrepreneurship and the policies of small and medium-sized enterprises complement each other, and two are indispensable.

The policy of entrepreneurship constitutes the basis of the policy of small and medium-sized enterprises and lacks the support of the policy of entrepreneurship. The policy of small and medium-sized enterprises has become a castle in the air.

The focus of entrepreneurship policy should be to create entrepreneurial opportunities and enhance entrepreneurship by entrepreneurial education.

In recent years, the company has begun to pay attention to the development of small and medium-sized enterprises, and has issued a series of policies for small and medium-sized enterprises.

It is located in the entrepreneurial stage to the stable expansion section. Secondly, there is an organic link between the entrepreneurship policy and the SME policy. From the entrepreneurial stage to the 42 month after the start of the business, it is the focus of attention between the two companies. The front end of the entrepreneurship policy and the SME policy focus on starting from entrepreneurial activities to the new enterprise survival stage, aiming at providing loose conditions for entrepreneurial activities and improving their survival rate. Finally, the focus of entrepreneurship policy is to build an entrepreneurial environment system and seek the matching of entrepreneurial opportunities and entrepreneurial capabilities. The aim is to enhance the overall entrepreneurial activity level and expand the scale of SMEs. The focus of SMEs policy is to create a relaxed and favorable environment through a series of measures aimed at helping the new enterprises with growth potential and desire to achieve rapid expansion and growth. Entrepreneurship policy is different from SME policy. Entrepreneurship policy is positioned from the incubation stage of entrepreneurial activities to 42 months after entrepreneurship, and SME policy.