Home >

Nanjing Teachers' Dress Code: Is It To Train "Etiquette Girls"?

2010/9/18 16:01:00 88

??? 日本語 Fran?ais English 中文

The Nanjing Municipal Bureau of Education recently issued the 15 etiquette proposals for primary and secondary school teachers in Nanjing, covering two parts: image and manners, office and teaching etiquette, covering teachers' dressing and manners.

Teachers should be asked to wear dirty clothes, avoid being exposed, avoid being short, avoid being short, avoid being tight and avoid differences.

The proposal points out that the clothes worn outside should not be too thin and pparent. Instead of wearing straps, they do not wear exaggerated earrings, necklaces and other accessories, and can not dye nails and hair.

Nanjing City

A stipulation of the education bureau is dazzling by people.

The 15 big and small proposals include social networking, gathering, teaching in the classroom, even sitting posture and so on. In short, teachers are required to have etiquette and to have a family.

Can not help wondering, the Nanjing Municipal Education Bureau's 10 recommendations are aimed at standardizing teachers' words and deeds or training etiquette ladies?

In the eyes of others, this is a number of 10 pieces of advice, but falling on the head of the teacher is like a huge net, bound them firmly, not allowing the opportunity to show their individuality.

Such a rule is cruel to those young teachers who have just graduated from teaching posts. After all, they are in their youth, and when they like performance, they are killed in a cradle by a piece of paper.

If regulations

Teacher

Dressing instrument

We can also express our understanding, and do not know how to intervene in the teachers' Cyber life. What is the explanation for it? Is it necessary to be a teacher for a lifetime? It is necessary for teachers to be banned for life. Teachers are engaged in high intensity work and bear all kinds of pressure every day. Online access is just a good opportunity for them to relax themselves and entertain themselves, not to mention the fact that the Internet itself is a virtual world. If we want to make so many demands and impose unreasonable barriers, some teachers must be more serious.

Of course, there is no denying the starting point of the Education Bureau of Nanjing, but there is something wrong with the actual operation.

Teachers play an important role in "missionary work, giving lessons and solving problems". They do have an influence on students' behavior and behavior. But this does not mean that teachers should pay for students' behavior. Students still have their own judgement, and the factors that affect students' behavior are also various. Sometimes a casual person on the street may become an object of imitation by students. Do we have to ask everyone who goes to the streets to dress properly, not to expose too much and not to wear tight clothing? Obviously, it is impossible.

Besides, a CPPCC member who initiated the proposal was said to have seen a teacher wearing a strap shirt squatting down to tie his child's shoes and wearing a low collar collar to see his underwear through the collar.

Excuse me, why do you not pay attention to this teacher's behavior to help students tie up their shoelaces?

The 15 proposal may destroy a school, because there are too many constraints, not only the teacher will feel awkward, I am afraid even the students will be uncomfortable.

It is suggested that Nanjing Education Bureau consider carefully before making a decision. After all, what we need is natural teachers, not false etiquette girls.