Sinopec Investigates The "Sky Wine" &Nbsp, Saying It Does Not Have Any Concealment To The Public.

For the day before the network burst

Is it related to Lu Guangyu's uncertainty?

These people said that the investigation team was composed of the discipline inspection and Supervision Bureau, personnel department, general office and sales department of Sinopec Group Company.

In April 11th, Tianya forum published a post titled "Lu Guangyu, general manager of Sinopec Guangdong company, wasting money on huge sums of money". He posted four copies of the invoice for the purchase of liquor. The total consumption amount of the invoice was about 1 million 680 thousand yuan.

Net post says Lu Guang Yu has purchased three batches of high-end wine, with a total value of 2 million 590 thousand yuan.

All wines are used by individuals. "

For the above revelations, Xu Tao, spokesman of Sinopec Guangdong Petroleum Branch and assistant director of the general manager of the office, have said that the purchase of these liquor has nothing to do with Lu Guangyu's personal affairs. Li Hailin

But the person in charge said that it is hard to say whether the "sky wine" incident is related to Lu Guangyu's individual. It depends on the findings of the group company.

Net friend: can Moutai oil be expensive?

According to reports, many netizens strongly urged the parties concerned to thoroughly investigate the matter, saying that Sinopec could not "claim that they would increase oil prices on the one hand, but also spend a huge sum of money on top grade liquor" on the one hand, and sarcastically satirize: "can oil mixed with Moutai be expensive?"

"This incident has caused great damage to Sinopec brand, far exceeding the sky chandelier incident."

The person in charge said that Sinopec Group learned about the situation before many media reports on the 13 day, and dispatched the company's oil sales division to Guangdong for an investigation.

In July 2009, netizens broke the price of Sinopec headquarters chandelier lamp 12 million, and triggered a public discussion of the luxury decoration of monopoly state-owned enterprises.