Louis Weedon, France, Sued The Business Jury

Following the Apple Corp, Internationally renowned brand LV Also encountered recently trademark Registered disputes. The world's "LV" has been registered as a trademark of cooking tools such as cooking rice cookers by a domestic company. The French LVMH MOET & CHANDON Hennessy Luis Vuitton group has submitted the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the SAIC to the court.

The world's "LV" has been registered as a trademark for cooking tools such as cooking rice cookers by a domestic company. France LVMH MOET & CHANDON Hennessy Lewis Vuitton group sued the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the SAIC to the court. Yesterday, the reporter was informed that the Beijing intermediate court decided to quash the ruling.

Louis Weedon registered LVMH trademark in France in October 17, 2001, and approved the use of items including precious metals and their alloys, precious metal products or precious metals plated, such as works of precious metals, gold and silver products (except cutlery knife, fork and spoon). In 2002, Xinyuan Enterprise Limited applied for a registered trademark "LVMH" for cooking kitchenware products such as cooking utensils, lunch boxes, bowls and so on. After verification by the Trademark Bureau of the General Administration of industry and Commerce of China, the preliminary verification announcement was made in September 14, 2003.

Later, Louis Weedon filed an application for objection to the trademark office. The Trademark Office has decided to approve and register the LVMH trademark applied by Xinyuan company. Louis Weedon refused to accept the application and applied for a review to the business jury. The reconsideration of the jury found that the trademark of Xin Yuan company and Louis Weedon's trademark did not constitute an approximate trademark prohibited by law. The jury decided to reject Louis Weedon's application.

Louis Weedon filed a lawsuit against the business jury. Louis Weedon company believes that the LVMH trademark of Xinyuan company is a copy and imitation of Louis Weedon's well-known trademark, infringing on the company's prior business rights and violating the relevant provisions of the trademark law. The company asked the court to revoke the ruling of the judges, and ordered the judges to make a ruling again.