Qingdao Two Enterprises Uniform Sampling Inspection Unqualified Response Is Called Stock Clothing.

< p > Shandong quality and Technology Supervision Bureau recently announced the results of the provincial supervision and spot checks on the quality of student clothing products in the second quarter of 2013. Of the 57 batches of products, 7 batches of products were unqualified, of which 2 of Qingdao's school uniform production enterprises were tested unqualified.

In July 26th, the Qingdao Municipal Bureau of Education officially responded that the sampling products were only pilot production, < a target= "_blank" href= "http://www.91se91.com/" > clothing < /a >. After the problem was discovered, they were all stored as stock, not circulated to the students, and the specific technical details were also open to question. Therefore, it was unreasonable to judge that the products were unqualified.

< /p >

< p > < strong > the product being sampled did not flow into the school < /strong > < /p >.

< p > Shandong quality and Technology Supervision Bureau has conducted spot checks on 57 batches of student clothing products produced by 57 enterprises in the whole province.

< /p >

< p > according to the results released by Shandong Provincial Bureau of quality and technical supervision, the 7 batches of products of 7 enterprises (list see photo) do not meet the requirements of relevant standards, and the unqualified rate of sampling inspection reaches 12%, which involves 2 enterprises in Qingdao.

< /p >

< p > unqualified school uniforms are mainly related to pH value, fiber content, color fastness to washing and so on. Qingdao's two school uniform production enterprises are not qualified because of fiber content.

< /p >

< p > City Education Bureau found that the results of the spot checks were not entirely consistent with the facts.

First of all, the Provincial Quality Supervision Bureau recently announced the results of the second quarter 2013 student clothing product quality checks. But in April this year, the Provincial Quality Supervision Bureau went to Qingdao to check students' costumes. The Qingdao area had not yet made the 2013 summer clothing production. The sample clothing was a small batch of Stock clothing in 2012, which was not circulated to the students at all.

< /p >

< p > secondly, in June 2012, Qingdao completed a new round of public bidding for primary and secondary school students in Qingdao, and began to make unified use of the accessories products of the provincial standard accessories enterprises since the autumn of 2012. The summer clothing fabrics that the Provincial Quality Supervision Bureau has selected for inspection is the production of the provincial winning bid accessories enterprises Fujian new Tongan needle < a target= "_blank" href= "http://www.91se91.com/" > textile < /a > Co., Ltd.

< /p >

< p > < strong > is only a pilot. If it is not closed, it will be sealed < /strong > < /p >.

< p > the City Education Bureau also explained the unqualified situation of the students in the spot checks: in June 2012, the provincial winning bid accessories enterprises proposed that adding a small amount of cotton fiber into the cotton (less than 3%) would help to improve the softness of the fabrics. The city office considered that the students were more comfortable in summer clothing, and agreed that the fabric manufacturers should make a pilot batch production.

After receiving these batch of fabrics, the production enterprises immediately put into production in order to ensure timely supply, ignoring that the content of the 50% cotton 50% polyester fiber has been marked on the washing label, resulting in a small batch of fabrics being processed into garments, and the products shrink greatly.

< /p >

< p > after finding out this situation, the City Office of labor and industry promptly communicated with the management personnel who installed the inspection for students in the city's fiber inspection department, and finally decided to require the fabric manufacturers to stop the trial. They still made the production according to the requirements of 50% cotton 50% polyester fiber content. At the same time, they demanded that the city textile inspection institute strictly do the inspection work of the fabric follow-up products, and the inspection conditions were all up to the requirements, and the qualified summer clothing had been distributed to the students.

< /p >

< p > "the first batch of experimental fabric garments, we require all enterprises to do inventory processing, not to the students.

In April this year, the Qingdao provincial Student Quality Supervision Bureau sampling product is the batch of clothing, so there is a discrepancy between the detection content and the washing label.

Li Baoqi, director of the office of the City Education Bureau, said that the sampling inspection involves Qingdao Yi Yi Textile Co., Ltd. and John Lone Sports Industry Co., Ltd., which supplies school uniforms to cities such as South, Laoshan and Laixi. There are hundreds of school uniforms, and 50% of the cotton and polyester fibers have been washed and labeled in the < a target= "_blank" href= "http://www.91se91.com/" > clothes > /a, which results in inconsistent cotton and polyester contents.

< /p >

< p > < strong > "it is unreasonable to disqualifying" < /strong > < /p >

< p > according to the introduction, the Qingdao student clothing fabric that was selected for inspection has a small amount of cotton fiber composition (less than 3%), but the price of the cotton fiber itself is not lower than that of cotton and polyester fiber. Adding a small amount of cotton fiber is also conducive to improving the softness and comfort of the fabric, and the fiber content is allowed to fluctuate by 5%.

< /p >

< p > based on the above situation, the Qingdao Municipal Bureau of education believes that it is unreasonable to determine the products sampled by the two production enterprises in the second quarter of 2013.

< /p >

< p style= "text-align: center" > /p >