Provincial Quality Supervision Bureau Announced The Third Quarter Of 2014 Student Clothing Inspection Results

In the third quarter of 2014, the provincial quality and Technical Supervision Bureau sampled 78 batches of clothing products produced by 78 enterprises in the province, of which 15 batches of 15 batches of products did not meet the requirements of relevant standards.

The spot checks are based on the requirements of GB18401-2010's basic safety technical specification for national textile products and GB/T22854-2009 knitted student clothes.

Yes Student clothing Fiber content of products Formaldehyde content 18 items including the pH value, decomposable carcinogenic aromatic amine dye, color fastness to washing, color fastness to rubbing, color fastness to water, color fastness to perspiration, light fastness, odor, marking, light fastness, sweat, color fastness, bursting strength, strength of trousers after crotch seam, size change rate of water washing, slipping, pilling, and distortion after washing were tested.

Spot checks found that Xie The 15 batches of 15 enterprises, such as Jun min textile and Garments Co., Ltd., and Hyatt Garments Co. Ltd., do not meet the requirements of the relevant standards.

Related links:

In the third quarter of 2014, the provincial quality and Technical Supervision Bureau sampled 53 batches of labour protective footwear products produced by 32 enterprises in the province, of which 3 batches of 3 batches of products did not meet the requirements of relevant standards.

The spot checks are based on GB 21148-2007 "personal protective equipment safety shoes", GB 21147-2007 "personal protective equipment protection shoes", GB 21146-2007 "personal protective equipment professional shoes" and GB12011-2009 "foot protection electric insulation shoes" and other standards.

Combined with strength, general requirements for toe protection of footwear, footwear internal length, impact resistance of footwear, specific ergonomics characteristics, shoe ergonomics, shoe upper thickness, upper rip strength, shoe upper tensile properties, insole and insole thickness, non slip bottom thickness, outsole folding resistance, shoe piercing force (piercing additional performance), shoe piercing resistance structure (piercing additional performance), electrical insulation performance (margin additional performance), antistatic shoe electrical performance (electrostatic additional performance), bottom anti slip area, slip resistant outsole thickness, outboard height pattern, and logo 24 items were tested. The upper height, shoe seat area, shoe sole structure, shoe upper / outsole for labor protection footwear products.

Spot checks found that the "Niu Gang Wang" labor protection shoes (2014-6-25 polyurethane bottom shoe safety injection), Shengli oil field gold island industrial limited liability company's labor protection shoes (2014-6-10 rubber shoes safety adhesive A), and the pressure resistant items of the shoes are not qualified; the double double labor protective shoes (2013-7-26 polyurethane bottom shoe shoes 15kV injection), the electrical insulation performance items are not qualified.