Luxury Tax Is Acceptable To The Public?

In the United States, the voice of disapproving taxes on luxury goods is very high not just for millionaires but for ordinary people. In the 90 era of the last century, the United States Congress had introduced cruise ships, personal airplanes, and precious stones. Leather and fur Luxury goods such as luxury goods are levied, but it is found that the results are very different from those expected in advance.

It is undeniable that there is a dispute about whether the luxury tax should be explicitly collected in China. Although the consumption tax reform is advancing continuously, the news of "luxury tax" is only heard, and no clear policy is issued.

Some government officials believe that China needs "luxury tax". Because the production of luxury goods is generally not replicable, and at the same time, in the production process, it often costs a lot of resources, and high taxes are taken for granted. At present, there are many "not bad money" people. There are more "bad money" people. There is a great disparity between the rich and the poor. The new round of income distribution reform needs to be accelerated to solve the problems among regions, between urban and rural areas and between industries.

At the same time, reporters found that support levy extravagant The people of the consumption tax think that through the taxation of luxury goods, the consumption of the rich can be transformed into the support of the state's tax revenue, so that they can be subsidized to other social public, which can not only make the tax function more equitable, restrain the extravagant consumption effectively, but also play a positive role in solving the increasing income gap and balancing the interests of all social strata.

Frankly speaking, in some people's eyes, taxation of luxury goods is "digging rich people's money", "robbing the rich and helping the poor" and achieving the so-called social equity. However, many people doubt whether the Levy of luxury tax can really curb the consumption of luxury goods. "You have to study the shopping psychology of the owners, and the owners who are willing to pay huge sums of money do not care about paying more." A real estate analyst told reporters frankly that in his view, most of the people who spend most of their money are successful people. They do not mind facing thousands of luxury tax in that area.

Remember the classic dialogue in big movie? "We do not sell the best in real estate and sell the best." Such lines were unthinkable at that time, but now some of the dialogues have become portrayal of the Chinese concept of real consumption. Betty, who works at Chanel store in the United Kingdom, told reporters that some wealthy people from mainland China did not ask which season was the latest item after entering the store, but asked "which is the most expensive".

"They seem to be accustomed to not buying the prettiest ones, but choosing the most expensive ones." Betty said, "they (Chinese buyers) hardly care about the price, but they think the expensive is the best." Zhang Dawei, a luxury car dealer, also believes that the real consumption tax on luxury goods will not be too great for consumers who buy cars. Just like the Levy of large displacement vehicle consumption tax in 2008, it caused a collective price increase of large displacement cars at that time, but after the price increase, it also slowed down for several months.

Land Rover Jaguar dealer Lee told reporters frankly that people who can afford luxury cars will not care about this tax and fee. Nowadays, the price of a car on the market is several hundred thousand yuan. "And the more rich people buy cars, the more luxurious and luxurious they are. The more they want to buy, the better they will be." Mr. Li said.

Guo Fanli also believes that the Levy of so-called luxury tax is beneficial to the government, but it has impediment to the masses and the long-term development of the economy. " Luxury goods Tax is not a behavior of "robbing the rich and helping the poor". Although luxury tax will make higher income people pay higher fees for luxuries, poor people will not enjoy better benefits. A larger portion of luxury tax will be paid by the government as official expenses. Guo Fanli said.