Bags, Sweaters And So On.

In order to further promote overseas consumption reflow and stimulate domestic consumption, since January 1st, China has further expanded the scope of tax reduction for imported consumer goods, and implemented tax reduction for 16 imported consumer goods, such as luggage, wool or cotton coats, fur suit suits, scarves and blankets.

After tax reduction, bags,

The provisional import duty rate for the suit is 10%.

,

The provisional import duty rate of the blankets is 8%, the provisional import tariff of vacuum thermos cups is 12%, and the sunglasses are 6%.

According to the introduction, in addition to these daily consumer goods, household water filter bottle core and other household filter products tax reduction is also worth mentioning.

In accordance with the tariff implementation plan of 2016, the provisional tariff rate for domestic water filters including household filter bottles dropped from 12% to 5%.

This is also a good news for the general public who is increasingly concerned about the health of drinking water.

Related links:

More than a month ago, Liu Shangxi, director of the Institute of finance, said at the "2015 China Reform Forum", "nearly two years, the documents issued by the light finance department, including the State Council and the Ministry of finance, have nearly 40, a month almost 2, so many documents have been issued. The following reflection is that the document has not yet been digested, and the new document has come again, let alone implementation and landing."

"According to the present way, we are busy with sending documents, busy with conveying documents, busy with supervision, and busy with reporting below, then it is very likely that there will be a phenomenon of driving on ice. The wheels are turning and the cars are not moving forward. There is a phenomenon of reform and skidding and idling."

Obviously, the high level is very determined for reform, but the key is implementation.

In each news report of the Politburo meeting or the executive session of the State Council, we can read the four words: "pay close attention to implementation".

It can be seen how difficult it is to implement, but why so many scholars have turned a blind eye to it, but have been struggling to put forward the idea of supply side reform to nagging themselves, or to provide Reagan economics and laver curve for supply side reform.

It is very strange that China's economy is in this way. Is it useful to reduce taxes? Even if it is a little bit useful, is it not already implemented?

In fact, all the problems in China should go back to the starting point to think, rather than circle around and constantly change the formulation.

Why do ordinary people even think that they can understand their toes? Scholars avoid talking about it and talk about some empty theories.

In fact, I have confidence in this round of deepening reform, at least more than the previous round of reform.

I remember 11 years ago when I wrote an article: "reform needs to be pushed forward".

But at present, the prime minister Keqiang has personally said that it needs to be forced to reform.

Indeed, when life is better, reform is hard to push.

It is often said that it is inevitable to die and die.

For example, in the past, when we talked about the reform of state-owned enterprises, we were worried about laid-off workers' riots. Now, because the scale of state-owned enterprises is getting smaller and smaller in the days of lagging reform, the state's retreat and progress are driven by interests, and the mechanism is not in place. It is passive. This year, the proportion of GDP created by state-owned enterprises is about 20%, and employment is estimated to be 15%.

Of course, banks will not be able to bear it. If 78 trillion of debt is not changed, the larger the liabilities, the smaller the GDP ratio and the bigger the bad debts of banks.

That's a vicious circle.

2016 is not the most difficult year for China's economy. The more difficult the economy is, the easier it will be to push ahead with reform.

The supply side reform is nothing more than a new formulation of structural adjustment. There is no need to make a mountain out of a molehill.

Moreover, when you talk about oversupply, we must not forget that there are still many poor people in China, as well as those who have not enough to eat and the high Gini coefficient.

Although the reform of the income distribution system is also in the scope of the supply side reform, I have asserted that many scholars have ignored the toilet lid and rice cooker that came to mind in Japan.