Italy Football Association Claims "Guangzhou Clothing Store"

How can the Italy Football Association come to Guangzhou to fight a lawsuit?

Originally, they found that Guangzhou businessman Tang was operating in Tianhe District, Guangzhou.

Compared with court hearing in Tianhe District, the trademark "ITALIA" and the registered trademark of the sports jacket and sports pants are all shields. The letters "ITALIA" and "FIGC" have the same letters and shapes. They all contain crescent shaped elements surrounded by tricolor blocks, longitudinal long shields, tricolor blocks and Pentagram stars. The number and color of the pentagram, the location and size of the tricolor around the color block are slightly different, but the overall structure of each element combination is similar.

Although these sportswear is marked with its own trademark in the sports coat collar, the "ITALIA" trademark logo similar to the plaintiff's trademark has been highlighted in the chest of the sports jacket and the right lower side of the sports pants. It is very easy to make the consumer misunderstand.

Therefore, the court of Tianhe District decided that the defendant, Tang, had constituted a violation of the exclusive right to use the registered trademark and had to pay 100 thousand yuan.

Dove told "love" to pay 180 thousand

A food company in Shantou has used the packaging and decoration of "DOVE/ Dove" silky milk products and "DOVE/ Dove" milk white white chocolate products without permission. The "love" silky chocolate products with the above packaging are sold in Guangdong, Jiangxi, Hangzhou, Changsha and other places.

For this reason, the US Mars Inc with "DOVE/ Dove" and "crisp fragrant rice" has taken Shantou's "Ai Fu" to court.

The court found that Tianlong food counterfeit products sold by the plaintiff for the well-known decoration of the well-known commodities had constituted unfair competition, and the economic loss should be compensated by 180 thousand yuan.

"PUMA" catch Li Gui shop compensate 35 thousand

In December 31, 2009, the notaries entrusted by the "PUMA" company came to a shop in West Lake Road, Yuexiu District, where they bought two windbreaker and paid 200 yuan.

Careful examination revealed that the windbreaker was used in the right chest, back, hanging tag, washing water mark and zipper head, which was similar to that of the leopard's graphic trademark. In the size label and tag, the trademark was similar to the "PUMA" and the leopard graphic trademark.

　　編者按：于是，“PUMA”一紙訴狀告上法庭，法院審理認為，商鋪店主何某應賠償“PUMA”經濟損失35000元。