Zhu Daming: Can The State Council Cut Prices To Dampen Crazy Prices?

From the perspective of Smith's thinking, it is clear that the price reduction is a short-term temporary measure, because it is obvious that regulation will not only reduce prices and house prices, but will distort the price system and create greater injustice and increase paction costs. Once the market is corrected, it will not rebound normally.

Only by reducing paction costs and increasing trading opportunities can all parties benefit.

One of the sixteen measures to reduce prices refers to the nature of the problem.

Forced the State Council to introduce measures to reduce logistics costs and management costs.

Since December 1, 2010, all toll roads have been exempted from tolls for vehicles loaded with fresh and fresh agricultural products. A small number of mixed farm produce and overload vehicles with reasonable range of error within the scope of reasonable measurement error have been carried out according to the vehicle loading legally; potato, sweet potato, fresh corn and fresh flowers are included in the green channel catalogue.

All regions should further standardize and reduce the booth market fees and supermarket entry fees.

We believe that this measure should not be a temporary measure, but as a long-term measure.

Just imagine, all the private enterprises are trying to reduce the cost and benefit the people from the price. Why can't our managers reduce the pportation costs such as paction costs? From Bernanke's near rogue attitude, he has declared that the growth mode that relies on external demand has already driven to the top.

To develop domestic demand, we must first straighten out all kinds of domestic level system and reduce the cost of logistics.

Not only for agricultural products, but also for manufacturing industries, and even lower housing prices in some high cities. The less convenient pportation system will also promote the uniform heat dissipation of housing prices.

Another measure is to reduce the management costs. Now the management fees of small traders are too high to be passed on to the people's consumption in the form of price. All kinds of taxes and fees are too heavy, and the way of pferring prices can no longer continue.

Why can't the government reduce the management cost? It should be understood that the stricter the management, the greater the cost of management, and the higher the paction price.

What needs to be explained is that strict management here does not mean strict compliance with law and discipline. It means that many management is unnecessary. Many of them are problems that can be solved by both sides of the market. Why do we need to put in a piece of work?

Therefore, since the enterprises are pursuing the minimization of administrative expenses, why can not the management department be able to minimize the cost? Therefore, the State Council has demanded that the unreasonable fees be cleared and cancelled.

The fees charged by governments at all levels should be appropriately reduced according to the actual situation.

But the question is, what are unnecessary management fees? They should be clearly listed. They should not be too vague or too vague. It is easy for executives to take advantage of the loopholes.

One of the sixteen price cuts is the fight against hoarding agricultural products, which are hot money, some hot money from the pformation of credit capital, and some idle capital derived from industrial capital. They come from the real estate market in the storm. They come from a large number of money supply distortions to the state-owned enterprises, and state-owned enterprises take the excitement of their frying everything. They come from all kinds of coal mines and industries. Because of the pition of these industries, opening up monopoly industries is far from being expected, and they have to fry everything.

The fundamental way to combat hoarding and speculation is to eliminate the status advantage of state owned loans and open a monopoly industry to private capital. Most people still work in private enterprises, and their survival is related to thousands of households.

{page_break}

In fact, the reason why prices are so fierce is the recurrence of a series of old diseases.

For example, the distortion of credit system, for example, too much taxes and fees in the service industry, for example, that private capital can not enter monopoly industry and fair competition.

Judging from the performance of Sinopec, can we still believe that the big monopolies have the sincerity and ability to stabilize prices? Oil prices are the basic products. Wanton price increases have shown that the monopoly group is willing to sacrifice the consumption power of the people in order to maintain the high price of monopoly.

As far as oil shortage is concerned, Qi Fang, President of Hebei chamber of Commerce and industry, said that the fundamental reason for "oil shortage" lies in the monopoly system in the oil market.

On the one hand, the low oil refining profit leads to the low production enthusiasm of oil companies. On the other hand, the two major oil companies maintain the market operation in the planned economy mode, and the production and market are out of line, and the plan can not keep up with the market changes, resulting in the imbalance between supply and demand in the domestic oil market.

Sinopec acknowledges that the oil shortage caused by hoarding is another case of identity monopoly. Li Rongrong, our former SASAC, sang a song of triumph. The performance of petrochemicals in the price was too damaging. From the end of 2008 to the middle of 2009, the price of crude oil dropped to 32 US dollars. However, our oil price has been maintained at a high level until a little bit lower. When the oil price rose, the reason was very high. When the oil price was falling, the price of oil was kept high, so that people kept paying high oil prices, so that people could pay for monopoly profits. They also cried all day long, and cried all day long, all kinds of subsidies and unwilling to make profits.

What is the role of the monopolistic group in maintaining the stability of the national economy? Is it a fire fighting or a fire strike? Do not think that the people are all ignorant people, they do not know what is going on.

The practice of deceiving the ear and stealing the bell will surely make us laugh for thousands of years.

Moreover, the various government documents should not be fooled by too much "theorization". What people most want to see is sincere sincerity.

In fact, no matter what the price of oil, coal, electricity and water rises year after year, there is no way to see the effect of stabilizing prices. These are the root causes of the rising cost of living.

Without sufficient competition, the monopoly of identity is monopolized all day. These prices can not be reduced, and these monopolistic profits are running into personal belts. Maintaining monopoly interests is actually maintaining the pockets of executives.

When the housekeepers get rid of the wind, do you still expect these monopoly profits to be used to the people?

There are sixteen ways to reduce prices, some of which are reversed, but most of them are to see whether the departments concerned can reduce their own expenses and expenses, reduce taxes and administrative expenses and pportation costs, and these prices can at least reduce by more than 30%.

Moreover, many people now blame the moderately loose monetary policy on rising prices, not in fact, but mainly in the flow of credit and the distortion of the loan structure.

Now that monetary policy has changed sharply, it will surely cause a great impact on the whole economic system. This kind of impact can not be hurt now, but it is internal injury.

The super fat power should first lose weight and reduce its distortion in the price system, so as to fundamentally reduce paction costs and management costs, reduce prices and benefit the people.

Read more about moral sentiments, and read more about the wealth of nations. Even "rich people" is good for the country and the people.