China'S Footwear Manufacturing Needs To Turn To Technology And Develop New Lanes.

At present, the structure of "brain country, torso country, hand and foot country" has been gradually formed in the world, and thus determines the status of different countries in international science and technology competition.

The so-called "brain state" is based on technology.

The so-called "trunk country" is independent innovation.

The so-called "hands and feet country" mainly undertake subcontracting production and processing, and earn a small amount of processing fees.

Foreign companies take advantage of the control of overall design, core technology, procurement and sales, and make up the majority of the countries and regions of the world under the command of these more than 20 "brain countries".

Throughout the international market, the profits of all Chinese export shoes are not matched by a Nike. The export enterprises of China's developed Fujian and Zhejiang are only earning "little sweat and money". Their biggest problem is lack of technology and less brands.

We can no longer say that the economic aggression and exploitation of western countries can be grasper, because whoever masters modern science and technology will master the world. This is the law of iron.

As far as the overall situation is concerned, China is still in the "trunk country" status.

The vast majority of central and western parts of China are in the "hands and feet" position. Since last, the pfer of "subcontracting enterprises" to the western region has a distinctive "hand and foot" feature.

According to statistics, the total number of patents applied by foreign enterprises in China is 6.4 times that of Chinese enterprises.

Some industries with strong manufacturing and manufacturing capabilities in China are mostly "world factory", and 90% of export products are OEM products.

In the huge financial tsunami, these OEM enterprises without their own brains are easy to "sink".

The way to realize "independent innovation" of shoes and clothing enterprises

The economic development and competitiveness of a developing country can be supported by technological innovation resources from developed countries. However, the path of "Japan and South Korea road" and "Latin American Road" on technological progress tell us whether the economic entities rely on others' innovative achievements or rely on their own initiative to improve their competitiveness, and the final result is totally different.

The former innovates actively on the basis of absorbing others' innovative achievements, and successfully realizes pformation from the less developed countries to the developed countries and into the ranks of the world's industrial and technological powers.

While the latter passively absorb others' technological achievements, they are still lagging behind.

The comparative results of the two technological progress strategies tell us that the economic entities must innovate independently.

In China, independent innovation has gone through three stages.

The first stage is the foundry stage. The advantages of participating in the international division of labor are low cost, imitative, and very few innovative things.

The second stage is the imitation stage, which is generally pursued by "bringing ism". It is shown as follows: first, simply follow up, introduce and digest one by one, and step by step towards foreign technology.

The two is passive introduction, that is, through the purchase of foreign advanced equipment, patents, drawings and other technological innovation achievements directly into production, without digestion and "import substitution".

The three is the introduction of joint ventures, which is to achieve the "local technology spillover" effect of foreign-funded enterprises through "market for technology" strategy.

These three forms are essentially passive technological progress strategies, and the right to dominate technological achievements is in the hands of foreign enterprises.

In the past quite a long time, some local industries in China have been accustomed to adopting this technology strategy. The result is that some industries in our country are caught in the quagmire of "introduction, backwardness, reintroduction and then backwardness".

Transform the torso to the brain

2011 is the opening year of China's twelfth five year plan.

The timetable for China's modernization has entered the "second half" of tackling difficulties.

What is the guarantee of the sustainability of modernization? What is the basis for writing the glory and glory of the first half? The key is to make significant progress in independent innovation, accelerating the pformation of the mode of economic development and improving the socialist market economic system.

Independent innovation is imperative.

At present, the fundamental competition in the world is competition in scientific and technological innovation.

The international financial crisis is not yet smooth. An independent innovation "competition" for the future development of the commanding heights has been launched: the United States has increased the R & D investment to 3% of GDP, the highest level in history. The United Kingdom is aiming at developing a low carbon economy and digital economy, "building the future of the UK"; the European Union announced the investment of 105 billion euros to develop the green economy; Russia proposed the development of nanotechnology and nuclear energy technology.

At this point, speeding up independent innovation is not only in line with the general law of the pformation of the world economic development mode, but also whether we can have a new engine in the future development and whether we can gain new advantages in the future competition.

It should be noted that there are still many Chinese enterprises, such as shoes and garment manufacturers, willing to act as "hands and feet" of western enterprises.

Under the institutional mechanism of one-sided pursuit of growth rate, those regions and enterprises that have abundant natural resources, large economic volume and fast growth can always easily acquire cheap production factors and earn high profits under the background that the price formation mechanism can not truly reflect the scarcity of resources and the cost of environment. Naturally, they do not think of innovation; in some cases, the speed and scale of success or failure of the cadre assessment system are still keeping pace with speed.

The underlying reason for China's independent innovation lies in its system and mechanism.

Without solving these problems, China's future economy will have no hope.