Amphoteric Fuzzy Design Of Clothing

Clothing is a manifestation of culture.

Clothing culture is what happens, changes and develops in the natural environment, social environment and interaction.

Clothing aesthetics and clothing are bound by certain cultural backgrounds and morals, and also reflect people's aesthetic consciousness and ideological feelings.

Wearing clothes is a kind of personal behavior as well as a social behavior.

In a sense, people wear clothes not only to show gender, to play roles, but also to show their status. People can dress freely and completely. The difference between the sexes is restricted by their social norms and codes of conduct.

Cultural tolerance reduces clothing amphoteric

In the course of the development of human clothing, women wear men wear women's wear phenomenon frequently, and some extreme violations of the secular, deviate from the norms of dress behavior.

A rebellious act regarded as a popular culture is a manifestation of subculture.

Young people took the lead in this role.

For example, the generation born in 1960s has become the main force of society after the war.

They hope to be happy in time to pursue the irrational and weird way of life of ideology. Clothing is the object of their dissatisfaction. The hippy and punk dress will blur the gender, break the old dress concept and shake people's traditional dress concept.

And the soil they grew up in is the "rich society" in Europe and the United States, the multicultural foundation, supporting young people's arrogant behavior.

It is the condition for reducing the size of both sexes.

Equality consciousness change sex dressing

There are certain differences in gender factors, including physical fitness and reproductive function, which make men and women bear responsibilities, obligations and work in social and family aspects. In ancient times, men's superiority and inferiority in different countries are more serious. For this form, the difference between men and women in dress art will naturally be reflected.

Because women's "inside the main" and male "outside the main" form, making women become men's "private property", women believe that "Sermons for the sake of their own friends, and women are those who please themselves," preaches, and is willing to become flower basket, flowers and gardens, which are pleasing to men and dare not go beyond the thunder pool.

This creates a worldly notion that women should be weak, plump, gentle and gentle, and their dress colors are rich and decorative.

Men are strong, decisive, vigorous and energetic.

The dress should be dull, dull and unnoticeable.

The difference in dress between men and women, though strengthening the differences between men and women in physiology and psychology, reflects the complementary nature of sexual psychology in the human world. It is a cultural form of sexual intercourse between the sexes.

And when human beings enter a highly civilized society, this cultural form will lead to the vagueness of the clothing of both sexes.

In twentieth Century, because of the war, women walked out of their homes, took off their chains, wore the same clothes as men, and did the jobs that men could do.

At this point, women have developed their own thinking and how to find their own independent position. In China, there has been a stage of women's dress that does not love red dress and love arms.

Natural regression reduces gender differences

Since God created human beings, there is no distance between the sexes. It is the difference between civilizations that aggravate the differences between the sexes.

Finally, civilization reduces the sexes.

In the era of great industrialization, informationalization and electronization, the voice of "women's feminine beauty" and "masculine beauty of men" will be drowned by this cry.

It is out of date to interpret human dressing behavior by using the ethical function of clothing to hide human body. Instead, it is a kind of ideological tendency and behavior mode of primitive natural human body returning. It shows the charm of human body with thin, pparent and exposed, and uses men's feminine design and masculine design to eliminate the difference of gender.

Natsu Parry Lee, a fashion designer, used this concept in the design of women's clothing. For the first time, she used shoulder pads in women's clothing design, exaggerating the width of female shoulders to cater to the psychological desire of "anti male chauvinism" and the pursuit of individuality and freedom.

Vivian Westwood, inspired by the "anti institutional trend of thought", boldly combined all kinds of unimaginable materials and styles in an almost rough way, blatantly challenging traditional challenges, and named his clothing store "sex" and "traitor".

All designs are weird and unusual.

This grotesque and absurd design immediately won the applause of Western young people and became the spiritual leader of punk.

Her clothing brand is the first choice for young people.

Her unrestrained design thoughts completely broke away from traditional constraints and fundamentally changed people's traditional concept of clothing.

Jeans were the first to break through the limitations of sex.

It has lost its gender color and has become a genuine "single sex" or "neutral" garment, which promotes the legalization of women's trousers style in the East and West.

The popularity of cowboys, to a certain extent, led the fashion designers in the latter half of the twentieth Century to constantly change the image of the cowboy. The phenomenon of washing, fading, breaking and tearing was regarded as a "decadent" phenomenon and became a note of "returning to nature".

It is also a reflection of the democratization of clothing in the twentieth Century. It destroys the tendency of sexism in the past clothing. From the fashion trend, it is a symbol of "Youth" and "vitality". It is a symbol of environmental awareness and return to innocence calling for ecological balance.

It will also be an absolute condition for the survival and development of the twenty-first Century.

Compatibility of costume design

The object of costume design research is human beings. People have different personality characteristics. This requires designers to meet the differences and variability of service objects.

Designing divergent, diversified and flexible thinking requires breaking through the frame of the stereotype thinking and finding creative inspiration, while the difference between the designs of the two sexes is the nearest "kinship".

The design thinking of duality is different from the "golden mean thinking". The latter refers to the "Neutralization" aesthetic thought in Chinese tradition.

The dual-use of dress design is not just an external form of reference, but an essential change and a shift in style.

Cross infiltration, diversity, unity and new changes.

Giorgio Armani Italy senior clothing designer, the design style of his women's wear is the result of pplanting men's clothing, which also benefits from the foundation of his early men's wear design. "My first ladies' costume actually used men's style and women's size" is this characteristic masculine fashion, which has led the fashion industry to start a new era of women's clothing after experiencing rebellion and frenzy.

The wide shoulders of his women's clothing made women's clothing appear an unprecedented shoulder width era and developed into the underwear design. Some people said that he was playing the gender mismatch game, and the real embodiment of the designer's charm was not a form but a style, a taste and a personality.

The compatibility design of clothing conforms to the modern people's ideology, value orientation, life style and aesthetic taste.

The clothing attire consciousness brought by special attributes has been broken through by people.

Drawing inspiration from heterosexual design will be another area for designers to excavate inspiration.

Due to the construction of social culture, the dress code of two sexes will be unified with the development trend of social pluralism.

Clothing is no longer an important condition for maintaining the social structure. Single gender models will be challenged.

To grasp and use the compatibility of clothing gender design is a richer, more innovative and more social sense of the times. It is worthy of attention and discussion by designers.