Lang Xianping: Who Is The Biggest Promoter Of Inflation?

Since the beginning of this year, China's CPI index has been rising steadily. The CPI index released by the government in July has reached 6.5%, exceeding the "severe inflation level" defined in economics. shrink 。 So who is the current round? Inflation The biggest pushing hand? In my new book, why is our life so helpless, I gave a clear answer. 　

At the beginning of this year, the seeds of price rise began to germinate and seemed to start by private enterprises. First, Kangshifu intends to raise the price of barreled instant noodles by 0.5 yuan per barrel from April 1, 2011, and then the four major brands of Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Libai and nice are also coming up. The price will rise to 15% in the near future. After the interview of the development and Reform Commission, Kangshifu has said that the price plan for barreled noodles has been suspended in April 1st, and some supermarkets that originally planned to increase the price of daily products such as washing powder and shampoo also decided to postpone the price. But more worrying is the rise in the price of refined oil. Come one after another 。 Since April 7th, the price of gasoline has increased by 500 yuan per ton, and the national average 93 gasoline has increased by 0.39 yuan.

Aren't you surprised that Master Kang has been interviewed and Unilever has been interviewed? Why can't we talk about these state-owned oil companies? If you look at the response of the media again, one reaction is that the interview has become the specific content of the secret talk, the way of the interview, and the specific measures that have been concluded at the end of the interview. Another reaction is that the interview department's position is very subtle, saying that these private enterprises are not allowed to lift prices. This is a little bit interesting, that is to say, on the "broad road" of price rise, those monopolized state-owned enterprises are moving forward rapidly, but private enterprises have already failed to catch up with the 2 way cars.

Unilever said it would increase by 10% in April 2011 and P & G also rose by 5%~15%. Why do prices go up? Unilever said that the price of raw materials, such as petrochemical products, vegetable oils and inorganic chemicals, has increased by 40% on average, and the cost of daily chemicals has increased by about 20%. In fact, from June 2010 to December, most of the chemical raw materials had risen more than 40%, but basically exceeded 60%. With so many raw materials rising, can the products of enterprises not rise in price? Then I want to ask, why does the price of raw materials rise? Who rose?

As you know, many of the raw materials of these chemicals are petroleum by-products, and the rise in oil prices is an indisputable fact. Who should really be interviewed? It should be PetroChina and Sinopec. Because only 37% of our oil imports are imported. Why do you have so many reasons? If oil prices are contained, will not the daily chemical products be increased? If you are good enough, you should go to those Middle East oil producing countries. You should tell them that you have to produce more so that the price of oil will come down. Or you can talk to the chairman of the Federal Reserve, Bernanke, again, saying that you have paid too much money and do not send so much in the future, because it has affected the lives of the Chinese people. But what is the situation now? Or take our private sector operation.

More reluctantly, our power companies say that the price of electricity will go up too. The reason given is that the price of coal is rising. The increase of coal per ton from 2010 to December is more than 100 yuan in October. The power company said it was losing money, so CLP called for a 3 cent increase in electricity consumption. Then I am interested to find out. How much is the ratio between your power company and coal? According to the survey, our electric power company uses about 16 billion tons of coal every year, but 2.1 million tons are produced by ourselves, and 7 million tons are not allowed to rise by the NDRC, which together account for 57% of the total coal consumption. That is to say, only 43% can really increase the price. Why do you raise 3 cents? If our electricity is linked to coal, and if domestic oil should be linked to international oil, why do you not fall when international oil prices fall? {page_break}

In addition to the above mentioned monopolies such as oil and electricity, in addition to some unwarranted nominal price increases, there is another industry that I have to admire, that is, our telecommunications. Do you see melancholy Cui? Cui Yongyuan didn't bombard telecommunications several times during the national "two sessions"? Now more data are revealed, which accounts for about 2% of household income in foreign countries, but it accounts for 7% to 8% in China. What is more abominable is that our telecom industry charges too much, which is totally beyond our imagination. Some people say that we monopolize the core resources of state-owned enterprises, including China Mobile, which are bought without any innovation capability. In my opinion, this is not entirely true. Take the set meal of our telecommunication company. This package is not understood by foreigners. Unless you are very clever at math, you can see where the trap is from this package. In other words, our telecom industry has posed a great challenge to the intelligence of people all over the world in designing packages. I think this should be their innovation.

What we are doing now violates a logic, that is, "pull the trigger and move the whole body". It was said that oil prices should rise and others should be linked up. Now we are very multimedia and irresponsible, do not do fact investigation, and then bombardment of these private enterprises, saying that you are premeditated. Tandem price rise 。 To say collusion, who is conspiracy, I think you all know.

Feel terrible, and feel helpless, our monopolistic enterprises seem to never have a way to clear their position. They do not know that the central enterprises for the whole country, in order to serve the people, is dedicated to the people, is to do what the people do not want to do, this is the responsibility of the central enterprises. But what is the actual situation? They created a lot of trouble for the people, and used the inconveniences of the people to map themselves. Now China's oil price is more expensive than that of the United States. Do you know why? Because they are expensive when importing. Why do I say this? Because PetroChina and Sinopec have added the cost of eating and drinking to them. For example, PetroChina recently bought a house for its employees in the core area of Beijing, and a legendary Sinopec chandelier, which just started to say that spent about 10000000, later proved to be millions of dollars. The cost of things like this is going to cost them, but these information is never released. And then add the cost of stupidity, the cost of each mistake, and at the end of the day, our oil price will not be cheaper than the international crude oil price. The result of frequent misjudgement is that when others are tall, it is high. When others are low, it is still high. Understand what I mean. Therefore, all these costs add up, our oil price is the most expensive in the world, which is also the inevitable result of stupidity.

In fact, we have an antitrust law in July 2008, and the monopoly law can not take advantage of monopoly. Snatch The interests of the public. With the anti monopoly law, we should be very happy, right? Since you have no morals, the law must abide by it. We can pick up the weapon of the "anti monopoly law" to protect our rights and interests. However, in the anti monopoly law, there is such a saying that all enterprises that are related to the national economy and the people's livelihood are not in the regulation of this law. Well, what is the relationship between the national economy and the people's livelihood? That is to say, as long as I am already monopolizing the industry, it is called the national economy and people's livelihood, for example, PetroChina and Sinopec. Now we have no way to do it. Because it is neither bound by law nor subject to moral constraints. So we have to amend the "anti monopoly law", that is, to re examine what is related to the national economy and people's livelihood. In this case, the question is coming out again. Who is revising it? The deputy to the National People's Congress. It can not be revised by PetroChina or Sinopec.