Home >

Because Of The "Big Deal" 10000 Yuan Knitted Fabric Was Returned.

2011/9/20 10:03:00 32

??? 日本語 Fran?ais English 中文

Hanging out of the cloth is relatively thick, and the actual production of cloth is relatively thin, because "

Favour one more than another

"Problem.

Textile City

A businessman in the East market has had a hard time recently, and eventually he has to return the 10 thousand yuan to the customer.

At the end of August, Mr. Cai, a client from Jiaxing, bought cloth from the Sales Department of Mr. ho in the East market.

At that time, Mr. Ho's shop department was hung with a piece of knitted fabric, which had a thick handle and a price comparison.

Benefit

So Mr. Cai was very satisfied with the fabric. He immediately signed an order contract with Mr. Ho and asked Mr. ho to produce knitted fabric which was worth 10 thousand yuan according to the sample and paid the money on the spot.

Two days ago, when Mr. Cai came to pick up the goods in accordance with the agreement, he found that the knitted fabrics that had already been produced were not as thick as samples. For this reason, he refused to accept the goods and asked Mr. ho to return the money. Mr. ho did not agree. The two sides had a dispute. Finally, they came to the light textile city judicial office for mediation.

According to Mr. Ho, there is a gram weight on the cloth, which is produced according to the weight of the knitted fabric marked on the sample cloth. The knitted fabric and sample cloth already produced are identical in weight, and there is no quality problem.

So why is the gram consistent but the handle is completely different?

After careful questioning by the staff of the judicial office, he finally gave the truth.

It turned out that the handle of the different parts of the same needle weaving cloth at the beginning, middle and tail was obviously different. The cloth was cut off from a piece of cloth at that time. When it was cut, it wanted to look better. The employees in the market department picked up the thick part of the whole cloth and thought it was more representative and attractive.

According to Mr. Ho, the staff of the judicial office understood that the employees in Ho Ho's market department were to make the sample cloth more representative, but in fact, the cloth was not representative, but on the contrary there were differences.

Sample cloth

Inconsistent with finished products.

After that, the staff asked Mr. ho if the weight of the cloth should be weighed.

Testing

Whether it will be higher than the marked weight, Mr Ho admits that this will happen.

In view of this, the staff believed that the responsibility for causing the dispute lies in Mr. Ho, though he did not deliberately act in the production process, but its practice has objectively misled Mr. Cai.

After mediation by the judicial staff, he finally agreed to refund the loan.

He said at the same time that he would learn from this incident, and that the relevant samples of future display and labeling must conform to the finished products, and that the possible discrepancy must be made clear to the customers in advance so as not to happen again.