Focus Of The Spirit Of The Two Sessions

Two sessions(NPC and CPPCC)

It has been closed.

As premier Wen Jiabao said at a press conference, this year is the last year of this government's term of office. It is also a year of great events, important matters and even difficult tasks.

There will be many things to do in the implementation of the spirit of the two sessions. So, in my opinion, where will it focus?

Social distribution

Besides the issue of injustice, how to carry out the reform of the political system at the administrative level, or how to do some pilot work, is also a focus.

We know that the Party Central Committee with Comrade Hu Jintao as the general secretary has always been cautious and positive about the reform of the political system. Premier Wen Jiabao has also talked about the importance of this issue many times.

But what aspects can be changed first and those aspects can be slowed down. If the first aspect of the reform is to be determined, what kind of principles should be changed? The result of reform is really conducive to national stability, people's satisfaction and social progress. This requires our designers and policymakers to exert their political wisdom, enhance their value latitude and integrate social forces.

For example, can there be a system of regulations for pparency, standardization and control in the issue of public funds? A mayor in western developed countries has been prosecuted and sentenced to 13 years' imprisonment for going out on holiday with his wife. After that, the court was still reluctant to give up 6 years and a half because of the cost of petrol.

The key here is that people have a relatively complete supervision mechanism.

So, is this a case in point? Is our administrative enforcement legalization and standardization of administrative error correction a more practical method of supervision? Or is there any way of doing this? It depends on whether our government is determined to try it. For example, in some high consumption fields, at some scenic spots, in some high-grade hotels, are our media reporters allowed to follow up exposure? I believe that as long as we play the positive role of news supervision, the ugly actions of disciplinary officials and corrupt officials will be greatly reduced.

Because a criminal official is not afraid of fear, but he is afraid that his name will appear in the newspapers, but he will not be afraid of fame.

At that time, a waiter in Beijing's Feng Ze yuan hotel could report to the Minister of State Commerce on the public diet and drink phenomenon through the central government, which played a very good role in curbing official corruption, warning officials' self-discipline and promoting social integrity. Why did the good tradition which was proved by practice not inherit?

Spiritual implementation

In order to integrate with the spirit of the party in the sixth Plenary Session of the 17th CPC Central Committee, we must focus on how we can contribute to the great development and prosperity of culture. If this government has made great determination in the economic foundation, we should also make great efforts and make great efforts in the legislation and legal system construction of cultural development.

On the one hand, cultural construction needs investment and needs money; on the other hand, it needs support and support in terms of system and regulations.

That is to say, in terms of money input, the government is duty bound to bear the main responsibility, but social and enterprise can also make great contributions.

In developed countries, there are many foundations. After the employer has invested in the foundation, he can avoid the corresponding taxes. That is to say, the boss is using the money he can give to the government to help some cultural units and cultural individuals to engage in cultural activities.

The Asian Cultural Association of the Rockefeller Foundation of the United States pays huge sums of money every year to support American and Asian people in cultural and artistic exchanges and exchanges between the two countries.

The unit where the author is located is often successful in applying for funds from teachers and students, which not only expands the influence of the enterprise, but also promotes the cultural exchange, and lays a good foundation for the development of American culture.

Why is it not suitable for our country to interact with such a link in the "cultural exchanges of corporate foundations"? The reason is that we do not have such regulations and provisions. Entrepreneurs have money and do not know how to serve the society and cheer for culture.

Besides, our national surplus money, besides buying financial products, has limited investment channels besides buying Treasury bonds.

Why can't we broaden our horizons and step out of the industrial boundaries, encourage the construction of several famous art groups as the main body, and mobilize the general public to expand their strength in the form of joint stock cooperation? That is to say, why can we design and promote financial products and financial products only in the banking system monopoly? Why can we only circulate in the economic fields such as mines, railways, petroleum and so on? The reform and development in the field of culture and art can also absorb and learn from this experience and practice.

Premier Wen Jiabao said at a news conference.