Ji'Nan Kou Kou Garment City Pformation 5000 Yuan "Pfer Fee" Can Be Returned To Provoke Controversy?

At the beginning of this year, Mr. Wang was behind the Kou Kou clothing building.

Market rental booth business, and for this reason to Ji'nan Kou Kou Garments Co., Ltd. paid 5000 yuan "pfer fee".

More than ten days ago, Mr. Wang's operation area was demolished because of the need for pformation. He could not continue to operate, but the company did not return the "pfer fee".

The reporter found that Mr. Wang's "pfer fee" is actually a "lease agreement fee", which should be paid to the landlord rather than the renter according to the relevant regulations of the company.

Ji'nan Trading Co., Ltd., explained that at present, it is only upgrading the relevant areas. After that, the store will be returned to the owner and will be postponed. Therefore, the "pfer fee" can not be refunded.

Merchant complaints 5000 yuan "pfer fee" hard to refund

Mr. Wang said that in February of this year, he took over the booth from a homeowner and was ready to sell it.

At that time, he paid a total of twenty thousand yuan to the landlord as a rent for one year.

In accordance with the relevant provisions, he also sent to Ji'nan

The company paid 5000 yuan "pfer fee".

However, what he did not expect was that ten days ago, Mr. Wang and many other businesses were notified that their area had to be upgraded so that all businesses needed to move out within ten days.

Due to the less than 4 months' operation, the landlord gave him more than 1.7 yuan of rent.

I thought that some of the "pfer fees" could be refunded, but after questioning, the reply of the relevant managers was that the cost would not be refunded.

At present, Mr. Wang has moved out of the stalls and stopped business for several days. The stalls have already been demolished and merchants are forced to move away.

According to Mr. Wang, although the business has just started this year, the business status of its own stalls is still fine, with an average income of several hundred yuan per day.

Compared with the non refundable "pfer fee", even more dissatisfied with Mr. Wang is that after the demolition of several owners' stalls, Ji'nan Kou Kou Garments Co., Ltd. did not set up new business premises for these businesses, which led him to "at least half a year of closure, and the loss was hard to estimate".

Site visits and demolished shops have become construction sites.

In the morning of June 24th, the reporters asked the merchants about the "pfer fee" at the "Kou Kou clothing tower" and the "boutique Street" in the south. However, the businessmen who were asked seemed reluctant to talk about it. They all said, "you go ask the market management staff."

After entering the "boutique Street" and turning a few bends, the reporter met a female stall owner.

According to its introduction, similar to Mr. Wang, her original stalls were also demolished in the ten months of this month, because she could not resettling the stores, so she could only relocate herself in the place. She subsequently revealed that there were many businessmen looking for local businesses such as herself, and there were not enough places to find them.

Under the guidance of many businessmen, the reporter found the shop that Mr. Wang said was demolished, which is located on the south side of Xiaoqing North Road road behind the mouth clothing building.

According to the visual inspection, the area is about forty or fifty meters long and twenty or thirty meters wide.

On the side of the road near the road, it has been blocked by a row of red iron shelves, with several workers standing on the shelves.

From afar, there is a yellow construction vehicle and another construction equipment on the open space in the area.

On the west side of the area, some baffles are separated from the wholesale market of the port town.

The reporter's secret visit fee is actually "rental agreement fee".

On the afternoon of June 21st, reporters came to the same place.

Ltd., a management office on the first floor, asked whether the rental store should pay the "pfer fee".

A male worker did not answer this question, but said that this situation needs to sign an agreement and go to the company.

The reporter went on to say that he had had friends rent a shop and paid thousands of Yuan's "pfer fee".

The staff still do not answer directly, but repeatedly stressed that the reporters first to see if there is a suitable house, if the landlord will introduce the necessary procedures, he stressed that the current "first floor is not allowed to rent."

For reporters later asked, "if after some factors can not continue to operate," pfer fee "can be returned, the staff directly said," you are not in the house now, ask this is useless. "

Another management office on the five floor of the Kou Kou clothing building, another staff member, said that the "pfer fee" referred to by Mr. Wang is actually the "rental agreement fee". At the same time, it is necessary to pay the agreement at the same time, and the "rental agreement fee" is indeed 5000 yuan.

In accordance with the relevant provisions, the cost should be paid by the landlord, but in practice, once the landlord proposes to rent the tenant, the tenant can not refuse.

If the rental can not continue to operate during the period of renting, can the fee be refunded? For this reason, the staff affirmed that "no way to retire", he further explained: "lease agreement fee" is not a deposit, which is equivalent to an agreement fee for signing the contract, and we must charge a portion of the cost for the house to rent out, which has always been the case.

The company will return the shop after the explanation is made.

On the afternoon of June 21st, a staff member of the trading department of Ji'nan Kou Kou Garments Co., Ltd., who did not want to be named, said in an interview with reporters that according to the company's regulations, it should be an agreement between the first party (that is, the person who rents out the house) and the company. The rental agreement fee is also paid by Party A. but there may be tenants who bear the cost in the actual paction, then the lessor may appropriately reduce the rent of the house.

The staff also explained that the market of Mr. Wang's market was very old. The purpose of the demolition of the area was to upgrade the original shop, and after several months of renovation, it would be returned to the original merchant and postponed accordingly.

For the reason of not returning the "pfer fee", the staff emphasized that this is only the upgrading of the original area, rather than the recovery of the store.

After the renovation, the house will be returned and will be postponed, so the cost can not be refunded.

For Mr. Wang's request, she said, "the rental agreement fee" is charged to Party A, so it can not be returned to him.

In response to the losses that may be caused to the merchants who are operating here, her answer is that the cost of upgrading and upgrading is also necessary, so the company also suffers losses.