Chengdu Five Star Hotel Sells LV Fake Products LV Company Claims 1 Million 800 Thousand

French luxury brands sold in five star hotels

(hereinafter referred to as "LV") turned out to be a fake.

LV commissioned a Chinese lawyer to investigate and collect evidence and conduct a notarization. He filed a lawsuit with the court: he demanded that Chengdu New Oriental Millennium Minneapolis stop infringing, destroy the LV products that are sold or sell for sale, apologize in the media, apologize publicly to the LV company in the lobby of the hotel, and compensate for the total economic loss of 1 million 800 thousand yuan.

Today, the high tech Zone court hears publicly related cases.

LV company sued that in February 15, 1985, the LV trademark was applied to China and registered with the Trademark Office of the State Administration for Industry and commerce. The registration number is No. 241019, and the subsequent registration is registered. The validity period of the trademark is from January 15, 2006 to January 15, 2016, and the commodities are included in Eighteenth commodities, including "Kun Bao, backpack, handbag" and so on.

Last October, LV found in a shop in New Oriental Millennium Minneapolis, Chengdu, which sold a large number of backpacks and wallets marked with LV brand.

Things like children.

Subsequently, LV purchased the products that infringe the trademark rights of the company as an ordinary consumer, and applied for the notarization office of the founder of Beijing to carry out notarization of evidence preservation.

A few days ago, LV commissioned a lawyer from Shenzhen to take the New Oriental Millennium Minneapolis in Chengdu and its affiliated company, Chengdu New Oriental Hotel Plaza Limited, to court.

In the evidence collected by LV company, there are 9 infringing trademarks, including backpacks, wallets, shoes, belts and so on.

LV company prosecuted 9 trademark cases respectively, and each case had a consistent claim.

Hotel: the shop has been leased and should be responsible for the business.

Yesterday, the reporter came to Chengdu New Oriental Millennium Minneapolis in the high tech Zone.

In this five star hotel, the reporter saw a total of three shops, which sell products including bags and bags.

Women's wear and so on, but did not see LV's products.

It is understood that the previous sale of fake LV products shops is the first, but also the nearest one from the hotel lobby.

When a reporter asked if there were bags and other products, the shop assistant said that the product had been sold out.

According to the vice president Zhu Wenwei of the New Oriental Millennium Minneapolis, the hotel opened in early 2010, and gradually introduced three shops soon after the opening of the hotel.

Shop owner is Ms. Xie Jinyu.

The New Oriental Millennium Minneapolis, as the lessee, clearly stated in the lease contract that the tenant can only legally use the shop.

Therefore, the hotel business activities, the hotel side did not ask too much.

"The lessee and the leaseholder shall strictly abide by the terms of the contract, and the lessee's actions shall be their own responsibility."

Zhu Wenwei also said that in future management, they would do more duty to remind the hotel of "shop in store".

LV: evidence shows that hotels sell fake goods.

This afternoon, the high tech Zone court will combine the 9 cases.

It is understood that Feng lawyer, a lawyer for the New Oriental Millennium Minneapolis in Chengdu, submitted the evidence of the lease contract to the court, and applied to the court to take the lessee Xie Jinyu as the third person in the case to hear the case.

LV attorney Li Menglong, lawyer of Beijing Deheng (Shenzhen) law firm, told reporters that the evidence collected by them and the invoices issued by merchants of these fake LV products directly pointed to the New Oriental Millennium Minneapolis in Chengdu, selling fake LV products, and did not know Chengdu New Oriental Millennium Minneapolis and the leasing behavior of merchants. "Judging who infringes the trademark right is not defined by the internal relationship of merchants."

What is the opinion of lessee shop No.1, Ms. Xie? Yesterday, the two time the reporter called the other party, the other party either hung up or called the wrong reporter.