Lao Fengxiang And Other Enterprises May Face A 1% Penalty For Last Year'S Sales.

< p > although the news of old Fengxiang and other gold stores suspected of price fixing manipulating the gold market is booming, but the Beijing Commercial Daily reporter visited Lao Feng Xiang yesterday to find that the passenger flow of the shop was normal.

Lao Feng Xiang's staff said that the price of old Fengxiang is different in different regions, but the price of several stores in Beijing is uniform, which is roughly the same as that of mainstream gold stores in Beijing.

The industry believes that Beijing's gold market is relatively stable because of its lack of close alliance. Even chaos is an individual behavior.

< /p >

< p > compared with the healthy and orderly state of the gold market in Beijing, according to industry sources, Shanghai gold brand is suspected of monopolistic pricing because of the close alliance relationship between the gold enterprises.

Large brands combine to "unified pricing", and consumers do not choose the market mechanism.

< /p >

< p > reporters learned from multiple gold jewelry brands that Beijing gold ornaments are independent pricing: gold prices fluctuate according to international gold prices, and the other part is "labor costs" such as jewelry development and design.

The price of these two parts is pparent, but because of brand positioning and added value, the final price difference is caused.

< /p >

< p > previously, there were reports that a number of Shanghai gold shops including Lao Fengxiang and Yu Garden mall were being investigated by the national development and Reform Commission Price supervision and Inspection Bureau and the antimonopoly Bureau.

As early as ten years ago, the Shanghai Price Bureau conducted a price monopoly investigation on the Shanghai gold jewelry industry association and 13 gold stores.

It is reported that Lao Fengxiang and other enterprises may face a 1% penalty for last year's sales.

< /p >