Home >

International Famous Brand Clothing Is In The Door Of Quality In China.

2013/10/8 23:35:00 85

??? 日本語 Fran?ais English 中文

Event playback 
 consumers choose to buy "a href=" http://news.sjfzxm.com/news/list.aspx "Classid=101112107105" > famous brand < /a >, but spend a lot of money without buying the reassurance in anticipation. A few days ago, the weekly quality report of CCTV exposes the disqualification of a batch of brand clothing, which has aroused people's attention to the quality of brand clothing again. It is reported that the Consumers Association of Beijing has conducted a comparative experiment from the casual pants bought randomly at various shopping malls in Beijing. In the comparative test, many well-known brand casual trousers that consumers are known to have been judged to be unqualified. Many famous brand casual pants were detected with safety indices such as pH value and color fastness. The safety issue of clothing once again sounded the alarm bell. Among the 57 samples sampled, 21 samples failed and 40% of the unqualified samples were unqualified. They include: a href= "http://news.sjfzxm.com/news/list.aspx Classid=101112107107" > ZARA < /a > Marlboro, Weiming, sketch, G2000, gold crocodile, Luo Meng, Guan Qi and other famous brands. Experts say clothes with unqualified safety can lead to various diseases such as dermatitis and bacterial infections. 
 in the market survey, it is found that the famous brand casual pants that are not eligible for sampling are expensive. Generally, they sell for four or five hundred yuan, and the expensive ones are sold to more than one thousand yuan. Although the price is higher, they are deeply loved by some consumers. In the comparison test of quality trousers, the low pass rate of famous brand products and the wide range of brands involved make many people feel surprised: so popular brand clothes unexpectedly exist the problem of unqualified quality! 
 problem 1: 
 false standard fiber content 
 in this comparative experiment, 6 samples of the 57 samples were inconsistent with the measured values, accounting for 10.5% of the total samples. Unqualified brands include ZARA, MCM, mascassini MARCCASNE, Gallery, cable and CAPEL, and so on. Among them, ZARA brand casual pants fabric is 75% cotton, 20% wool and 5% polyester. The measured cotton content is 68.2%, wool content is 10.6%, polyester fiber is 15.7% of polyester content, besides, it also contains 4% acrylic and 1.5% viscose. 
 problem two: .
 < a > href= > http://news.sjfzxm.com/news/list.aspx > Classid=101112107108 > formaldehyde > /a > exceeding standard /p >
 in accordance with national standards: formaldehyde content of B products should be less than 75mg/kg. In this comparative test, the formaldehyde content of the two samples did not meet the national standard requirements: the gold crocodile brand number was 308501-2, the measured data was 107mg/kg; the sample of Brian BRUIN brand was BA3MPL02AGN, the measured data was 95mg/kg. Clothing products with high formaldehyde content will gradually release formaldehyde from the clothing during the wearing process, and long-term exposure to formaldehyde gas can cause headache, dermatitis, eczema and other symptoms. 
 problem three: .
 pH > /strong < > /p >
 pH value beyond the standard limits will damage the skin's balance and resistance, resulting in skin allergy or induced infection, so that the skin is susceptible to germs. In this comparative test, 3 samples were measured pH value exceeded the national standard requirements: the gold crocodile brand number is 308501-2, the pH value is 3.2, the Weiming W&M brand number is CB3610, the pH value is 8.6, G2000 brand number is GMC06W130E06552002, pH value is 7.9. 
< div style= "page-break-after: always" > span style= "display: none" > /span > /div >
 problem four: .
 color fastness is not qualified .
 according to the testing personnel, the items of clothing color fastness include friction, sweat resistance and other indicators. If the dye falls off and transfers to the skin, it will cause trouble to consumers if it injure the human body or stain light colored clothes. In this comparative experiment, the color fastness index of the 16 samples did not meet the national standard requirements, involving brands: ZARA, ydu Y DC, Omar NECHEER, Marlboro Marlboro classics, Weiming W&M, sketch, G2000, gold crocodile, Cape Dino, G-STAR, mascassini, FA Du, and Guan Qi. 
 News > /strong > /p >
 link > /strong > /p >
In the two years, < 7 > strong > ZARA, there were a total of P unqualified .
 as a representative of fast fashion brand, ZARA is loved by young people for its fashionable fashion and frequent updates. However, its quality problem has been criticized for many times. It is reported that this is also the seventh time that ZARA has been on the quality blacklist since August 2009. The samples of ZARA casual pants produced or distributed by SA La Commerce (Beijing) Co., Ltd. are falsely labeled with fiber contents in Morocco. Among them, the nominal cotton content of the tag is 75%, the measured value is 68.2%, the nominal wool content is 20%, and the measured value is only 10.6%. In addition to the virtual components, ZARA, Yi Du Chun, G2000, Marlboro and other 16 samples are easy to fade. 
 reaction 
 brand silence 
 Customer ignition, /p >
 after the incident, our reporter contacted Ms. Cao Yanhong, the public relations communication department of SA La Commerce (Shanghai) Limited for the first time. When the press release was released, her cell phone was still unanswered. According to incomplete statistics, since August 2009, ZARA has been caught in "quality gate" for at least 7 times, but ZARA has never made any public statement or taken back products for the problem products. 
 yesterday, the reporter saw at a ZARA store in Chengdu. At present, it is a large number of new spring and summer listing, and there are still many customers buying on the spot. The reporter asked the clerk about ZARA's casual pants in Beijing, which was found to be "a href=" http://news.sjfzxm.com/news "fiber content less than /a", and she did not know clearly about it. Reporters then interviewed several consumers randomly. Their views on this matter are still mixed. 
"P," said Wu, a member of the public. She also read the CCTV report. "It is indeed surprising that ZARA has made such a low-level mistake." Miss Wu was also a hard core consumer of ZARA. The clothes she bought for ZARA were usually washed for two times and could no longer be worn. After the incident, she said she would choose products more carefully later. The reporter noted that a website also aimed at the ZARA "quality gate" survey results showed that 34.5% of consumers said that the quality standards of ZARA at home and abroad are different, and the quality of domestic ZARA products is generally worse than that of other countries. Miss Jia also had a deep understanding of this in an interview with reporters. "I bought the windbreaker of ZARA abroad, and found that the quality and tailoring are slightly better than the same sales in China." 
 consumer > /strong > /p >
 voice /p >
The quality of ZARA, editor of Miss P, has never been flattered. Their clothes are usually washed away, and their style is the most important. 
 Mr. Li white-collar, the ZARA coat I bought in London seems to have a better quality than the same one sold in Chengdu. 
 Ms. Zhang, private owner, I have bought ZARA T-shirt, the quality is a bit bad. I would never have bought it if it hadn't been for the beautiful design. 
 clothing buying weapon 
 according to the national standard, B clothing can directly contact the skin, C clothing is not suitable for direct contact with the skin. 
 when buying casual pants, you should look at the appearance quality and see whether the content of the label matches the real situation of the goods. 
 consumers are advised to wear new casual pants after washing.