Court Trusteeship Eight Thousand Shoes Become Scrap

In September 5th, the Shaanxi petition Office held a hearing on the case of Cao Junping, an individual proprietor in Shaanxi and an economic dispute in Yuanzhou District, Guyuan. At the hearing, the Guyuan Municipal People's Congress, the CPPCC and the Public Security Bureau and other departments discussed the enforcement, compensation and lease contracts involved in the case. At the hearing, Cao Junping stated that when he signed a lease contract with commercial building, he did not know that he had already mortgaged it until he had been forced to enforce the loan dispute with the bank. After the court hearing, the commercial building failed to compensate Cao Junping for more than 15 yuan, but up to now tens of thousands of yuan compensation has not been put in place. Cao Junping believes that during the auction of the building, the court forced him to pull away the value of one million yuan of shoes stored in his renting room, which has not yet returned and caused economic losses to him. Therefore, he made a compensation of about 1500000 yuan to the court. In this regard, the court explained that the remaining enforcement funds were in place, and Cao Junping could receive shoes and executive money at any time. When the commercial building was auctioned, the court wanted to sell the auction house to the other party as soon as possible, but Cao Junping refused to move the goods. In order to reduce Cao Junping's losses, the court took the shoes away for safekeeping. After that, the court actively contacted Cao Junping, but he had been reluctant to pull the goods. Cao Junping argued that when he went to the court to pull more than 8000 pairs of shoes, he was told to pay more than 10 thousand yuan of storage fees, because he was unwilling to pay, and then dragged on for 4 years. Now shoes were turned into waste products. Regarding the storage fee, the court took into account Cao Junping's decision to advance the loss. At that hearing, there was no definite conclusion in the case. After the meeting, the relevant departments will make further investigation and Study on Cao Junping's compensation. In August 4, 2003, Cao Junping and other 8 people bought 200 square metres of storefront in the South Hall of Yuanzhou commercial building, and paid the transfer fee of 25 thousand yuan. As a legal representative, Cao Junping signed a housing lease contract with Yuanzhou commercial building, with a term of 5 years, that is, from August 5, 2003 to August 5, 2008. Cao Junping spent more than 10 Yuan decoration. In the autumn of 2004, Cao Jun spent hundreds of millions of dollars on the purchase of a large number of high-end winter shoes, preparing for a big fight. At that time, the commercial building in Yuanzhou district was unable to repay due to the maturity of bank loans. Some of the properties were auctioned off by the Guyuan intermediate court. Cao Junping's shoe store just became an auction house. In November 2004, the Guyuan intermediate people's Court issued a notice: ordered Cao Jun equal merchants to move out of the auction house before December 15, 2004. When Cao Junping did not move out of court, the court forced the sale of more than 8000 pairs of high-end winter shoes purchased by Cao Junping, and auctioned the property. In December 2004, Cao Junping took the Yuanzhou commercial building to Guyuan intermediate court as a contract dispute. The court decided that the commercial building was defeated. The reason is that commercial building has concealed the information that the house has been mortgaged because of the signing of the rental contract. It decided to return Cao Junping's deposit of 5000 yuan and pay more than 60 thousand yuan of compensation. Cao Junping thought that the compensation was too small and appealed to the high court of the autonomous region. In September 16, 2005, when the Supreme Court maintained the Guyuan intermediate court's judgement, it added an additional loss of more than 90 thousand yuan, totaling over 15 yuan. Since then, commercial building has fulfilled the court decision.