Wechat Purchase Bags Are Not Good Quality, Return Hard

< p > with the rapid growth of WeChat users, a kind of "latent" WeChat in the business is also quietly rising. In the enjoyment of "micro shopping" convenience and quick return, it is also a big criticism. Recently, Ms. Wen bought a bad "a href=" http://www.91se91.com/news/index_f.asp "purse" /a by WeChat, but was deleted by the seller from WeChat friends. Because it can not provide specific information of shopkeepers, Cangshan industrial and commercial personnel are also unable to help. < /p >
< p > Ms. Wen is a "WeChat control". Besides daily chatting with friends, she also buys clothes, food and cosmetics on WeChat. < /p >
< p > some time ago, she accidentally saw a shop on micro-blog, and looked at the picture and felt that the clo leather bag was not bad, so she contacted the shopkeeper. The shopkeeper asked her to add his own WeChat, saying that WeChat also had pictures of the leather bag. < /p >
< p > store owner said in WeChat that he runs a luggage shop in Cangshan District of Fuzhou. She promised that if she had a bad leather bag, she could return it. Ms. Wen transferred money to each other's account through online banking. In January 2nd, Ms. Wen received a leather bag and found that the bag was very different from the picture. So she immediately contacted the store with WeChat to change the goods. The store agreed to change another equivalent leather bag for her, but 3 days later, she received the goods and found that the bag looked the same as "Shanzhai" and the bag had broken. < /p >
Ms. P felt that she had been fooled and agreed to discuss with her shop owner about the return. At that time, the shopkeeper agreed, but on the second day, she called the shop owner again, and was still in no answer. She turned on her cell phone and was ready to consult with the shopkeeper on WeChat, but found that the shopkeeper had disappeared in his friends list. < /p >
Ms. P had no choice but to turn to 12315. Because Ms. Wen could not contact the seller, she could not provide the specific address, contact information and online transaction records of the shops, and the business people finally could not help. < /p >
< p > here, business people remind the public that most of the < a href= "http://www.91se91.com/news/index_f.asp" > micro business < /a > does not have a physical store. The real information of shopkeepers is incomplete, whether the delivery of goods after collection, the after-sales service of products and other uncertain factors have increased the risk of consumption. Some illegal elements have taken the opportunity to exploit the loopholes and pretend to be trusted identities on WeChat to do marketing. When customers pay the amount, they will pull the black buyers, and often change names to hunt new customers. Some consumers who purchase through WeChat are waiting for the buyers to send the deposit when they pay the deposit. They are blackmail by buying WeChat accounts or suddenly disappear on behalf of WeChat account. < /p >
< p > < strong > related news < /strong > < /p >
< p > < strong > merchants said to buy 399 yuan to send a href= "http://www.91se91.com/news/index_f.asp" > scarf < /a > but to say "/strong > /p".
< p > to buy cash coupons or gifts for a certain amount of merchandise is a common way of promotion for many businesses. There may be some restrictive conditions when buying vouchers or gifts. Yesterday, the Lianjiang industrial and commercial bureau handled a sales promotion dispute. < /p >
In January 6th, Miss Wu of Lianjiang was ready to buy new year's clothes. When he visited a "Xinlan fashion clothing store", he saw the promotional advertisement banner "buy 399 yuan to send 98 yuan worth of scarves" at the shop door. So Miss Wu was going to enter the shop to buy a suit. In the shop, Miss Wu picked several clothes, and finally saw a fashion windbreaker priced at 458 yuan. Miss Wu bought a single shop and called the shop sales promoter to get a gift. But the promoters said that Miss Wu bought a new winter style and did not take part in the promotional activities that she had bought. < /p >
< p > Miss Wu believes that merchants refuse to give scarves on the ground of "new products not participating in promotional activities". They are deceiving consumers, and therefore complain to the business sector to require them to fulfill their commitments. < /p >
< p > in the mediation, the industry and commerce personnel said that since the merchants launched promotional activities to buy gifts, and did not specify restrictions, they should fulfill their sales promotion commitments. < /p >