2013 Corporate Social Responsibility Blacklist Exposing Gucci Sales Refurbishment Products

< p > < strong > Gucci < /strong > /p >

< p > < strong > reasons: Sales refurbishment product < /strong > /p >

< p > overview: with the rise of people's living standards, luxury consumption has become the focus of attention, but high prices do not bring consumers high quality enjoyment.

As early as 2011, news came out that Gucci (Gucci) would repair defective products returned by consumers and sell them to consumers as new products in stores.

Insiders say similar cases are not uncommon in Gucci.

After two years, the quality of Gucci's products sold in China was once again questioned. New products repurchased second-hand goods, and consumers demanded frequent returns. Gucci's reputation was not there.

< /p >

< p > not only Gucci, Pierre Cardin also exposed the same batch of products two times test results completely opposite, a testing unit is the Beijing Far East Zhengda Commodity Inspection Co., Ltd. under the China Federation of Commerce, a test unit is China's "a target=" _blank "href=" http:/ /www.91se91.com/ "> textile" /a "Industrial Federation detection center, has opened" a target= "_blank" _blank "," clothing "," clothing "detection.

Sinopec < /p >

< p > < strong > reasons: Qingdao oil pipeline explosion < /strong > < /p >

< p > overview: in November 22, 2013, the crude oil pipeline of Sinopec located in Qingdao economic and Technological Development Zone ruptured, resulting in crude oil leakage. Some of the crude oil was leaked into the municipal drainage culvert, which entered the sea fork and deflagration.

The accident resulted in many casualties.

At the same time, some crude oil enters the Gulf of Jiaozhou along the rainwater pipeline, and the oil passing area is about 3000 square meters.

According to the list of victims released by Sinopec in December 3rd, a total of 62 people died.

To this end, Sinopec will November 22nd as the company's safety production warning day.

< /p >

< p > < strong > ha medicine group < /strong > /p >

< p > < strong > reasons: selling counterfeit health products < /strong > < /p >

< p > overview: in December 13, 2013, the State Food and Drug Administration announced that in its enforcement inspection and sampling inspection of health foods, the 21 products, including Sai brand Wei Mei Ke slim granule, sold by Limited by Share Ltd pharmaceutical giant hyacinth pharmacy, contain chemical substances such as phenolphthalein and sibutramine, which belong to counterfeit health foods.

According to incomplete statistics, Harbin pharmaceutical products and health care products have suffered more than ten exposure to more than ten major products in the past ten years. However, up to now, some products with the word "ha" have been popular after repeated exposure.

< /p >

P > < strong > Abbott group < /strong > /p >

< p > < strong > reasons: food safety problems and false propaganda < /strong > < /p >

< p > overview: in August 4, 2013, New Zealand Fonterra group exposed its concentrated whey protein powder to detect botulinum toxin.

In August 5th, Gao B Gens, chief executive officer of Fonterra dairy, revealed that one of the company's customers was not exposed, because the company explicitly asked Fonterra not to disclose its brand name.

< /p >

After P, public opinion was in an uproar.

Abbott has become the focus of doubt, but Abbott has solemnly declared to the public: "the company that asks for concealing information is definitely not us, and all products supplied by the enterprise to the Chinese market do not use Fonterra problem raw materials."

< /p >

On the night of August 5th P, AQSIQ announced the contamination of Abbott products by botulinum.

In August 6th, under the pressure of public opinion, Fonterra announced that the company that asked for concealment is Abbott, which is the eighth polluting enterprise.

The public is shocked by Abbott's lies.

Abbott had to announce that because he shared a production line with Fonterra, the milk powder of two batches of Abbott was also contaminated.

< /p >

< p > < strong > reason: GlaxoSmithKline bribe door < /strong > /p >

< p > overview: GlaxoSmithKline bribery door was a drug industry bribery scandal that broke out in July 2013.

GlaxoSmithKline, the main manufacturer involved in the incident, used bribery to seek an unfair competition environment, resulting in the rising price of the pharmaceutical industry.

On suspicion of serious economic bribery such as commercial bribery, some senior executives of GlaxoSmithKline (China) Investment Limited were placed under investigation in accordance with the law.

Through more detailed details of the case, the interest chain of commercial bribery of a multinational pharmaceutical company has gradually become clear, and the backdrop of pushing the price of drugs to a virtual high has begun to emerge.

< /p >

< p > < strong > Everbright Securities < /strong > < /p >

< p > < strong > List reasons: 8. 16 Everbright Securities Oolong incident < /strong > < /p >

< p > overview: in August 16, 2013, 11 points and 05 points, the Shanghai Composite Index rose sharply, and the market rose more than 5% in one minute.

The highest increase was 5.62%, the highest index was 2198.85 points, the intraday close to 2200 points.

At 11:44, the Shanghai Stock Exchange said the system was running normally.

At 2 p.m., Everbright Securities announced that there was a problem in its independent investment arbitrage system.

In August 18th, the SFC informed the emergency handling and preliminary verification of the Everbright Securities Transaction and placed it on file for investigation.

On the afternoon of August 18th, Everbright Securities announced its own report.

In August 30th, the securities and Futures Commission concluded that the 8. 16 abnormal trading behavior of Everbright Securities has constituted a number of illegal activities, including insider trading, misleading information, and violation of the regulations on internal control of securities companies. At the same time, it said that it had responded to misleading the public. Xu Hao Ming, Yang Chizhong, Shen Shiguang and Yang Jian Bo were sentenced to life imprisonment in the securities market. The illegal income of Everbright Securities was confiscated by 87 million 210 thousand yuan, and a total of 5 times the total penalty, totaling 523 million.

< /p >

< p > < strong > ZARA < /strong > /p >

< p > < strong > reasons: supply chain pollution problem < /strong > < /p >

< p > overview: ZARA, one of the largest fashion retail companies in the world, claims on its website that it is "in good faith to establish contacts with a wide range of stakeholders and society, continue to engage in dialogue with interested parties and social organizations mentioned above, and that overall business activities should be pparent, especially for sustainable development strategies."

In fact, ZARA's actions are contrary to its public commitments. ZA RA even responded: "unfortunately, we can not answer questions from individuals such as schools, universities and professionals about our business models."

< /p >

< p > > after the Research Report on "green choice textile brand supply chain pollution" was released in Beijing, more than 6000 enterprises entering the pollution list, many international and domestic brand suppliers such as ZARA, H&M, Adidas, Nike, Lining and so on, many well-known enterprises supply chain has different degree of pollution prevention and control violations.

China's textile industry accounts for 50% of the world's fiber processing and 34% of its textile and apparel exports.

However, the textile industry produces nearly 25 million tons of waste water and other pollutants each year, but pollutes China's rivers, lakes, oceans, and even soil and groundwater.

{page_break} < /p >

< p > < strong > Johnson group < /strong > /p >

< p > < strong > reasons: product quality problem and discrimination policy for China < a href= "http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_q.asp" > consumer < /a > < /strong > /p >

< p > overview: in recent years, Johnson has frequently seen drug and health related products recalls around the world due to quality reasons.

According to statistics, since 2009, Johnson's Chinese companies have recalled products 33 times in mainland China.

In April 23, 2013 and May 3rd, Johnson (Korea) company recalled drug recall again for quality reasons.

< /p >

< p > May 3rd, Johnson lost all the main components of the drug due to the failure of the production machine, and recalled all children's Tylenol antipyretic analgesic syrup in Korea.

The same drugs, ingredients and doses are equally applicable to the Chinese market, but as in some recalls in the past, China's Johnson recall has become an exception.

< /p >

< p > reported that there were 48 exceptions to Johnson's 51 global recall since 2005, which aroused widespread social challenges.

From April 2005 to May 3, 2013, it involved at least 13 subsidiaries of Johnson, covering children's mouthwash, Infant Soothing liquid, pain relieving paste to adult calcium carbonate oral liquid, stomach medicine and contact lenses; from commonly used drugs, Tylenol, Merrill Lynch, and cyntham to uncommon Kelai, topiramate, risperidone, and WAN Ke; from surgical surgical orthopaedic equipment backbone sleeve to balloon dilatation catheter for cardiac interventional operation, and even from syringe, surgical suture line to household blood glucose monitor, at least 51 of the 27 drugs occurred, most of which were also sold in mainland China, but 48 times were not recalled or investigated in China. From

Every time the incident happens, Johnson China is always saying that the problem product has nothing to do with China.

< /p >

< p > < strong > GE Medical > /strong > /p >

< p > < strong > reasons: recall system inside and outside is different < /strong > < /p >.

< p > overview: GE medical, one of the top three medical device companies in the world, has been known as the "recall season" in the last three or four months. In July 30, 2013, October 8th and October 17th, three medical devices recalled in China, causing great social controversy.

< /p >

< p > the question is that the frequent recall itself has caused some doctors and patients to worry. The latest three recalled products, the Centricity PACS, the Medical Systems SCS and the single photon emission tomography (SPECT), are also referred to as "internal and external differences" in terms of recall information and time delay. The recall in China is obviously later than overseas.

< /p >

< p > most of the industry's uproar was in June 2013 in the United States because the GE nuclear medical equipment gamma camera Infinia Hawkeye 4 suddenly fell and died.

< /p >

"P >" after being ordered by the FDA (US Food and Drug Administration) to make the highest level recall of the same specifications and products in the United States, the GE company did not recall the products that were also used in China for four months, and is still in use.

< /p >

< p > < strong > Dumex < /strong > /p >

< p > < strong > list of reasons: mandatory a href= "http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_q.asp" > consumption < /a > first milk, damage to infant health < /strong > /p >

< p > overview: just as other foreign enterprises handled in China after "commit crimes", Dumex released the "first milk" incident, which ultimately chose to pfer responsibility to a project and replace executives in China.

However, whether the compensation for the affected infant should be punished according to the "breast milk substitute management method (Draft)", Dumex did not mention it.

< /p >

After a thorough investigation, the joint investigation team composed of relevant departments of the Tianjin Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and so on confirmed that since 2011, 85 medical and health institutions have been commissioned by Dumex, and 116 people have received the fees irregularities. 13 of the more serious disciplinary offenders have been seriously dealt with.

< /p >

< p > in the eyes of many people in the industry and the parents of newborns, Dumex's "first milk" incident is even worse than the simple promotion in the hospital. "It is a forced consumption" and is even suspected of deliberately damaging the health of infants and young children.

However, Dumex's response did not involve penalties for enterprises and compensation for infants and young children.

< /p >