D&G Dujibana, The Two Founders, Was Identified As "Intentionally Evade Taxes".

< p > the judge came to a conclusion in the tax evasion case of < a > designer /a Stefano Dolce and Domenico Gabbana. The two designers must know that it is against the law to do so. The jury of the court of appeal also questioned two Italy designers who thought their tax failure was "intentional". < /p >
< p > < /p >.
< center > < img alt= "" src= "http://fashion.chinaleather.org/Files/20140703/25/82183.jpg" width= "277" height= "277" / "< /center >
< p > < /p >.
< p > "the two designers are not trustworthy. They realize that the project can evade Italy's tax revenue and make people feel that they are legally run," said judge Laura Cariati. In April, the court of appeal upheld the decision of the lower court to convicted the accused. Despite a two month jail sentence, the designer and his accountant, Luciano Patelli, were sentenced to imprisonment in one year and six months. Although there is no way to free the designer from prison, the designer will not really lose his freedom because of the practice of "prison sentence in Italy less than two years later." < /p >
< p > Dolce&Gabbana designer was accused of using her Luxemburg holding company Gado to evade taxation in 2004 when she sold Dolce&Gabbana and D&G brands. Italy's tax police believe that Gado is actually a legal entity used to avoid the high corporate tax in Italy, and the judges reiterate this point. < /p >
< p > for the first time in court in early 2011, the designer Dolce and Gabbana insisted on denying all accusations. < /p >
< p > related links: the latest development of luxury brand Dolce&Gabbana tax evasion case < /p >
< p > the Italy famous luxury brand Dolce&Gabbana tax evasion case, which began in 2011, has been quite confident that the two designers clearly understand that their tax evasion has violated the law. The core of the debate is whether Luxemburg's holding company was born to shell out Italy's high tax burden. In April of this year, the intermediate court sentenced the Dolce&Gabbana two group and their accounting Luciano Patelli to their respective sentences of one year and 6 months, but two designers refused to accept them and would appeal to the high court. < /p >
< p > < /p >.
< center > < img alt= "" src= "http://fashion.chinaleather.org/Files/20140702/25/81835.jpg" width= "263" height= "193" / "< /center >
< p > < /p >.
< p > in the process of complaint, the lawyer of Dolce & Gabbana has always been a talisman for two people who do not understand tax evasion. "Their attention is focused on the creative aspects of models and fabrics, and I have never seen them handle any bills or charts to avoid tax. "But this statement by lawyers has recently been refuted by judge Laura Cariat," which is unbelievable. Once designers realize that this way of avoiding tax in Italy is effective, they are knowingly committed. Although sentenced to one year, 6 months' imprisonment in the Chinese trial, two designers will not really lose their freedom according to the practice that most of the prison sentences will be executed in less than two years in Italy, but they need to pay a fine of up to 550 million dollars. < /p >