Nike Is The 2014 Corporate Social Responsibility Index.

Here world Clothing and shoes Net Xiaobian to introduce the 2014 corporate social responsibility index released: Nike and other famous enterprises bottom

Today, the blue book on corporate social responsibility (2014), issued by the center for corporate social responsibility research, Department of economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, was released in Beijing. It announced the "social responsibility development index (300) of the top 300 Chinese enterprises", including Bailian, Softbank, Nike And other famous enterprises scored less than 2 points (percentage system) and entered the bottom ten of CSR.

Nearly 50% enterprises scored 0 points for one star company and 3 enterprises on the sidelines.

Among the top 300 enterprises in China, only 14 enterprises (4.7%) have a social responsibility index of five star level, which is at the stage of excellence; 54 enterprises (18%) have a four star level of social responsibility and are in the lead stage; 40 enterprises (13.3%) have a three-star social responsibility index and are in the stage of catch-up.

There are 55 enterprises (18%) in the social responsibility index with two star level and in the initial stage. The social responsibility index is a star level, and the number of enterprises in the bystander stage is the largest, accounting for 137 (46%), of which 3 enterprises (1%) scored 0 points in social responsibility development index, and did not voluntarily disclose any social responsibility related information.

The central corporate social responsibility index continues to lead the gap between the three private enterprises and foreign enterprises.

Compared with 2013, the social responsibility index of the three types of state-owned, private and foreign-funded enterprises showed an overall upward trend. Among them, the CSR index of state-owned enterprises increased the largest (8.1 points) in the year, followed by foreign-funded enterprises (7.8 points) and private enterprises (3.9 points), showing the overall improvement and individual differences in the social responsibility management, social responsibility practice and social responsibility information disclosure of our state-owned enterprises.

In 2014, the social responsibility development index of the top 100 state-owned enterprises was 52 points, especially the central enterprises scored 57.2 points, much higher than the total score of the 300 top Chinese enterprises (32.9 points), as well as 100 (26.4 points) of foreign enterprises and 100 (20.5 points) of private enterprises.

State owned enterprises and private enterprises prefer to disclose financial and compliance information. Foreign-funded enterprises focus on community relationship maintenance and supplier management.

Compared with the scores of social responsibility issues, state-owned enterprises, private enterprises and other domestic enterprises have similar performance. Foreign enterprises and state-owned enterprises and private enterprises are quite different. State owned enterprises and private enterprises tend to disclose financial data and compliance information, such as shareholders' rights and interests, and according to law.

On the contrary, foreign-funded enterprises pay more attention to the information disclosure of community relationship maintenance and supplier management, but the information disclosure of shareholders' rights and business according to law is relatively insufficient. State owned enterprises, as a wholly owned enterprise, have become an important concern of state-owned assets. The top 100 private enterprises are mostly listed companies, and their financial data and compliance requirements are relatively high. Both of them are domestic enterprises and are relatively weak in the practice of supply chain management, so their disclosure is also insufficient.

Foreign capital enterprise Most of them are global multinationals, localization operation and global resource integration are the key factors for their success in their locality. Therefore, the disclosure of community relationship and supply chain management is more adequate. Instead, the parent companies of foreign capital companies are generally not local, and the information disclosure of shareholders' feedback is weak.