Look At TPP From Another Angle: Resolving The Adverse Impact Of TPP On China!

Recently, the p Pacific Partnership Agreement (abbreviation)

It has aroused heated debate in the society. Public opinion is generally agreed that if the TPP agreement comes into force, it will have a great impact on China's economic development.

But in fact, we must not regard TPP as a trade rule restricting China's development.

At least for TPP, this is a competition mechanism, the goal is healthy upward.

Not the relevant agreements made by the United States must be bad for China. WTO is also dominated by the United States.

If we want to make progress, we must all have the basic ability and quality.

After the conclusion of the TPP negotiations, a spokesman for the Ministry of Commerce has said that the agreement is one of the important FTA in the Asia Pacific region.

China is open to the system that is in line with WTO rules and contributes to the economic integration in the Asia Pacific region. It hopes that the agreement will promote each other's free trade agreements in the region and contribute to the trade, investment and economic development of the Asia Pacific region.

At present, China has not yet joined the agreement, but it will not rule out China's accession at the right time.

In the short term, the agreement may have a certain impact on China's foreign trade, but in the long run, under the background of economic globalization, no multilateral trade agreement can exclude non contractual countries and regions from the international trade system, otherwise their development will be greatly restricted.

From the perspective of world trade evolution, the pattern of Global trade is always in a dynamic state with its own rules to follow.

Today, bilateral and regional free trade agreements have developed rapidly and become an important promoter of the deep development of economic globalization.

China will continue to work hard to achieve high-level bilateral and regional FTA, and constantly improve the new mechanism of open economy, so as to inject continuous momentum into industrial upgrading, structural adjustment and innovation and development.

It should be noted that if TPP is finally achieved, this means that the world economic and trade order will be restructured and China's industry will also face choices and breakthroughs.

From the history of TPP, Mr. Kissinger's vision of the current world order is likened to the modernization of the Westphalia System. However, he also points out that the prospect of our times is more severe, and that it must be moved by the situation, otherwise it will be challenged and engulfed.

No doubt, TPP is a challenge to the new order. It can be said that this is the reconstruction of efforts made by the United States to strengthen its universal values.

The economic background behind it lies in the development of capitalism to the present stage. In essence, the dividend of the world's unified goods market has declined for the growth of the world, and for developed countries, it is essential to share the bonus of developing countries and "FDI-".

"Mode" has reached a turning point and needs to be further developed.

The nature of capitalism's pursuit of profit requires further higher standards to enable all countries to open up investment in services and non tradable sectors, thus enabling mature capitalism to further share the pformation of other countries and the development of services.

The restriction of the corresponding rules of the sovereign state is a restriction on this development mode. Therefore, the ISDS (investor state dispute settlement mechanism) has been established. At the same time, there are rules that suit western liberalism principles as the precondition for negotiation.

If we can understand the inevitability of the birth of TPP, China will reduce antagonistic thinking and actively develop the dominant strategy to cope with challenges, thus leading to a desirable Nash equilibrium.

Looking at the new rules of TPP, we will find that the aim of TPP is not only to provide a more free trade environment, but to create a more measurable and rule based business environment, whether it is protection of intellectual property rights, labor environment standards, market access for agricultural products or the rules of origin of automobile industry.

For China, it is better to accelerate domestic reform, speed up the industrial pformation and the demonstration role of free trade area opening up with its erosion of trade status instead of sticking to the status of the king of commodity trade. Taking the rule as the standard, at the same time, multilateral BITS negotiations as a breakthrough, deepening the "westward movement".

"Strategy" to promote cooperation between Asia and Europe, thereby resolving the adverse impact of TPP on China.