TPP Makes China'S Textile And Garment Export Advantages No Longer Prominent.

In October 2015, the 12 negotiators of the United States, Japan and Canada finally reached agreement on the p Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP).

The consumer goods industry Research Institute of Sai Di think tank recently proposed that in response to the adverse effects of TPP on China's textile industry, it is proposed to strengthen the textile industry assessment and industrial early warning, optimize the export trade environment, increase the pace of "going out" and implement relevant preferential policies as soon as possible.

Implement relevant preferential policies as soon as possible.

First, speed up the implementation of the policy of accelerating the depreciation of fixed assets to expand to the textile industry.

The two is to summarize the experience of cotton target price pilot, perfect the existing subsidy way, and speed up the full implementation of cotton target price policy.

The three is to implement tax incentives and clearance policies for small and micro enterprises.

The four is to expedite the implementation of preferential policies to reduce enterprise income tax by half.

It is understood that TPP member countries are an important region of China's textile and clothing exports, accounting for nearly 40% of China's textile and clothing exports.

Among the Member States, there are two largest export markets of China's textile and apparel, the United States and Japan, and two Vietnam and Malaysia countries that rely heavily on China's textile industry, but the export competitiveness of their garment industry is rising. The liberalization of textile and garment trade within TPP members will profoundly affect the Chinese textile industry.

In response to TPP's response to China

The adverse effects brought by Sai Di think tank suggest strengthening assessment and industrial warning.

First, a comprehensive and systematic assessment of the full text of the agreement, as well as the impact on cotton textile, printing and dyeing, finishing and other subdivision industries, is proposed.

The two is to strengthen the study of the two annexes on the "shortage list" and the "rules of origin of specific products" in the fourth chapter of the agreement, and continue to optimize the corresponding export environment.

Three, we should pay close attention to the trend of negotiations among TPP Member States and strengthen industrial early warning.

optimization

Environmental Science.

First, we should promote negotiations in the FTA, reduce related trade barriers, and facilitate the export of Chinese textile and clothing and import of raw materials.

Two, we should actively participate in the multilateral trading system and promote the Doha Round negotiations.

We will promote the construction of the Asia Pacific Free Trade Area and fully explore the space of developing countries' textile and garment market.

The three is to clean up China's import and export links.

The four is to establish a mechanism for dealing with trade frictions.

Increase "

Pace.

First, we should give full play to the advantages of the upstream and downstream industries of China's textile industry chain, strengthen control over high value-added and high technology content links such as printing and dyeing, increase investment in new product design, R & D and marketing, work closely with manufacturing links in neighboring countries, and create a manufacturing base layout mode of "China + neighboring countries".

Two, we should seize the strategic opportunity of China to carry out the "one belt and one way" strategy and establish strategic partners with the countries along the route.

Three, we should make full use of the labor cost advantages of Southeast Asian countries and the zero tariff advantage of TPP members to speed up the shift of China's textile industry to Vietnam, Malaysia and other countries, and encourage and support enterprises to invest and build factories in the form of self built or jointly built industrial parks.