Refute "Poor Students Wipe Shoes To Wipe Out Salvation Justice".

In November 7th, a college in Chongqing set up 10 shoe shining stands in the school, attracting 53 poor students to compete, and the school decided to take turns to work.

These 10 shoes stalls are located in the teaching area and living area of the inevitable flow of people.

Shoes, shoes brushes, shoes and cloth are all provided by schools to poor students and their income is used to subsidize living expenses.

(according to the Chongqing evening news November 8th)

As the news came out, many newspapers have been reprinted. Ouch, this is a new thing. Are college students not engaged in scientific research?

Shouldn't college students sit in office for suits and suits?

How do you polish shoes?

Many so-called experts began to show off their skills in speaking and talking. They were amazed and said, "how can this be done? Your college must create conditions to encourage and guide poor students to take the road of self-reliance and work study, but how can you let other students brush their shoes?"

Just read an article entitled "wipe out the shoes of the impoverished student" to "salvation justice".

Will the poor students lose their justice if they shine their shoes?

What is your self-esteem? What justice? Wipe it away.

The author naively thinks: responsible for operating newspaper kiosks, students have self-esteem, is a just act, and said, "shoeshine is not shameful, but in the eyes of young people, shoeshine is always the lowest end of the line", writing is the high-end business.

I tell you, now that walking in the street, falling leaves can hit the college students, grab a handful of them, and run around the streets looking for work. Do you really think that college students are rare?

You really think that students wearing glasses and cocktails in high places are college students.

Some people say that work study can't do this, at least you can find a tutor or do something.

Not everyone is suitable for tutoring. Every weekend, college students who hang "tutor" signs on the streets are everywhere. Not everyone is tutoring, and not every family can afford tutoring. You really overestimate the level of consumption of our people.

In this way, a university with tens of thousands of people, a university with so many needy students, there are more than 50 willing to spend money on the shoe subsidy.

How many of you really think they are so self destructive? You have solved the cost of living for them.

The author said, "shoeshine": "it has greatly dampened the very fragile mind and sensitive self-esteem of needy students". What I want to say is that it is not your shoes but your eyes that really hurt their minds. You forget, look at yourself, what kind of mindset should you use to face the poor students and shine their shoes.

In the face of this matter, can we not just stare at the school, can we really look at the living conditions of needy students, in the so-called shoes and real survival, if you are changed, you will choose what, do not speak big words, do not shout slogans, feel your chest to tell me, shoeshine for poor students, is not stealing, not robbing, not prostitution, is relying on their own hands to earn money honestly?

What's cheap?

When this happens, do we really need to torture our poor students' support system, especially for poor students in private education. Can society not treat private school students and public students differently, but treat them equally and provide them with the same help?

We shouted slogans early and did not let students drop out of school because of poverty. But what kind of system should we use to provide a guarantee for poor students to go to school?

Especially in private schools, although the state has introduced a series of policies to help, but in the private students, the society's colored glasses have not been removed.

When this system is perfected, needy students will not need to polish shoes.