News Metaphor Of Two Pairs Of Shoes At The Recruitment Meeting

In April 12th, two days in 2008, a large number of Guangdong college graduates' recruitment sessions were held in Jinan University.

Due to the few job fairs before leaving school in July, many graduates from other provinces have come to the market.

There are girls wearing heels in line and carrying high heels for the interview.

The employment situation is grim, which is already an indisputable fact.

Thanks to his unique news sensitivity, the reporter of this report captured the seemingly unremarkable details of the recruitment meeting and made another vivid footnote for employment difficulty.

The so-called "two pairs of shoes" is only a small detail, but can be realized in life "experience", how graduates have long been tested by the recruitment fair.

From another point of view, it is a true portrayal of college graduates' life to run around among all kinds of job fairs. But how effective is this rush?

Every recruitment news is accompanied by the words "hot" and "crowded". However, the agreement of intent agreement has been signed, but it is still the same as chicken. There is still no sense of security. It is the general psychology of graduates when they do not know when they will be signed by the signing unit.

Some graduates describe the job as "gambling", which is both image and bitterness.

But this is "gambling", still losing less than winning.

Otherwise, how can we polish such rich experience of gambling?

With two pairs of shoes to attend the recruitment fair, there is still a question worth asking.

Why is it necessary to bring flat heels, apparently because it is too hard to line up and shuttle between the units. But in this case, wearing a pair of flat heels is enough. Why do I need to bring a pair of high heels?

In fact, there is also a hidden reason why you should wear high heels instead of flat heels during the interview.

Why is it so particular?

I don't think I need to analyze any more. I just want to try to give the recruitment company a good image.

Here, I do not want to discuss from the great principles of wearing flat shoes to affecting the image. What I would like to say is that we often criticize all kinds of discriminatory provisions in recruitment, and emphasize that recruitment should be based on "talent" as the first principle.

However, when graduates are so consumed with the choice of a pair of shoes, we can not avoid the fact that the inferior position of graduates in employment is so clear that they have to toss themselves in every insignificant detail.

In this sense, the "two pairs of shoes" at the recruitment fair should be a symbol, a symbol, because it records the miserable history of this difficult employment from one side.