The Reform Plan Of Income Distribution Is Still Improving.

Recently, according to media reports, the draft reform of income distribution led by the NDRC is nearly completed, and policymakers prefer the initial distribution area.

The national development and Reform Commission yesterday, in an interview with the first Financial Daily reporters, said that the details of the plan still need to be improved. As for the issue of income gap through the initial distribution or redistribution, there is no final conclusion.

There has been a consensus on how to solve the problem of income distribution. How to solve the problem of income distribution gap is still hard to be unified at present.

From the initial distribution or redistribution?

"Generally speaking, the most important way to solve income distribution is first distribution, and the core of the initial distribution is to expand employment and establish good labor relations.

On this basis, the two distribution will further improve.

Yesterday, Cai Fang, director of the Institute of population and labor economics of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said in an interview with our reporter at the "China Social Science Forum" press conference that he preferred to start from the initial distribution to solve the problem of income distribution.

Zheng Gongcheng, a professor of Renmin University of China, said in an interview with our newspaper reporters that the redistribution of income distribution should be strengthened. The main reason is that the problem of primary distribution is more complicated than that of redistribution. It is not only the three party of the government, labor and capital, but also a series of problems such as employment and economic growth.

"At present, the issue of income distribution has improved. In recent years, employment growth and labor mobility in China have maintained a relatively fast pace.

Therefore, we should continue to expand employment so that workers' income distribution can be better improved. "

Cai Fang said.

In his view, China's income growth is very fast in the whole world.

In the past 10 years, the per capita income of urban areas has increased by nearly 10%.

Generally speaking, the growth of per capita income in urban and rural areas has kept increasing at a constant pace, but the development of rural areas has lagged behind and the development is not at the same level.

The income statistics of floating population need to be precise.

While calling for reform of income distribution, we should also pay attention to how to make accurate statistics.

Liu Jian, who lives in the countryside, has been engaged in the IT industry for 7 years in Beijing, and the monthly salary has exceeded 10 thousand yuan.

However, he is still marked "unemployed" in the occupation column of Hunan local accounts.

Like Liu Jian, after graduating from college, the group of people who work in cities from the countryside has become larger and larger. However, their income status can not be fully displayed in the national income distribution.

The Chinese Academy of Social Sciences pointed out that at present, there is a lack of statistics on how big the income gap is.

In China's current statistics, the increase in the income of the rural population brought about by the migration of population, whether in the rural areas or in the collection of urban population income, is not yet available for part of the information of this group.

The narrowing of the income gap between urban and rural areas is mainly based on the flow of urban and rural population.

Without statistics, there is no way to judge the change of income gap between urban and rural areas.

Cai Fang said that finding the factors and ways to narrow the gap between urban and rural areas should take the reform of household registration system as a breakthrough.

At present, the flow of labor is still the flow of personnel, without the flow of identity change.