Industrial And Commercial Reminder: Buying Clothes To Look Closely At Labels

Today's clothing styles are changing with each passing day, and all kinds of popular elements and design concepts are coming all the way.

Clothing labels must be marked with formaldehyde content.

It is understood that from January 1st this year, Western clothing, coat and other 10 national standards for clothing formally implemented.

These standards have clearly stipulated the clothing pH value and the formaldehyde content and so on, request to express on the clothing label, in order to facilitate the consumer to identify and to purchase.

According to the new national standard, the pH value should be controlled between 4 and 7.5, and the pH value should be controlled between 4 and 9.

The formaldehyde content of suits and trousers should not exceed 300 mg per kilogram.

The content of pH and formaldehyde must be clearly marked on the clothing label.

Most urban clothing is not identified.

I visited many clothing stores in the South Ring Road and pedestrian street in the city, and found that most of the clothing labels did not mark the pH value and formaldehyde content, including some well-known brands.

Some of the clothes were marked with simple "B" and "direct contact with skin", but they did not indicate the specific value of pH and formaldehyde.

Many businessmen do not know the existence of this rule. In a brand store in the South Ring Road of the city, when the salesman asked if the salesperson knew the label and the formaldehyde content must be marked, the salesperson said he had never heard of it and never asked the customer.

Then, I immediately asked 10 consumers, the reply was almost the same. They all said that they all heard that formaldehyde exceeded the standard, which was harmful to the human body, but it was only limited to the decoration of the house. However, the excessive formaldehyde on clothing would also affect human health.

Many consumers say that every time they buy new clothes, they are washed and dressed again. Is that not safe?