Shanghai Leather Shoes Comparative Test Is Only Half The Combined Rate.

In August 11th, the Shanghai Consumer Protection Committee announced the comparison test results of 29 leather shoes ranging from 239 yuan to 719 yuan, which did not meet the standards of 13 pieces, and the coincidence rate was only 55.17%. The shoes of the problem involved Kang Li, the charm, Farali, Hasen and other brands.

This time, there are 10 suede leather shoes that do not accord with sensory indicators. For example, the sales of Kang Li brand leather shoes (model: 2L0011RDN) produced by the six hundred branch of Shanghai Xujiahui mall Limited by Share Ltd and Guangdong Nanhai dfeng Industrial Co., Ltd., its upper is obviously decolorizing, and after long wearing or washing, the color will be stained with socks and trouser legs.

The folding resistance is the index to check whether the shoe sole and the side of the shoe are easy to break. In this test, 1 leather shoes appear on the upper part of the shoe, which is produced by the nine sea Baisheng Plaza Co., Ltd. in Shanghai, and the AMEDA (love) brand leather shoes (model 93L45M48237) produced by the Yi Yi boutique shoe industry (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.

The combination of heel and heel does not conform to the standard, which will cause the heel of the shoe to be separated from the upper and is easily injured during the wearing process. In this experiment, there are 1 items which do not conform to the standard, namely Fala Li Sequin / sheepskin lenamel women's shoes (model: F21934) produced by Shanghai Fala Li Shoes Co., Ltd. the measured value of the heel force of the right heel is only 400N, which does not meet the requirements of standard 500N.

Peel strength is an important index for evaluating the adhesive strength of leather shoes to the sole and sole. The rubber shoes with low adhesive strength may produce glue when they are worn and stored. 2 of the tests did not meet the standards, such as the Hasen brand leather shoes made by Hasen Trading (China) Co., Ltd. (model: HS08701), and the measured values of peel strength of the bottom were not up to standard.

Consumer Protection Committee reminds consumers that the price should be considered when choosing leather shoes, but the price and quality of products are not necessarily proportional. In this experiment, 6 samples of leather shoes were below 300 yuan, of which 3 were not up to standard; 6 samples were over 550 yuan, of which 1 were not up to standard. Therefore, we should not buy cheap and choose high priced shoes.