Shanghai Promulgated "Ten Year Plan" For Reform Of Cadre And Personnel System

Recently,

According to the opinion, Shanghai will further expand democracy in the process of nomination of cadres, broaden the vision of selecting and appointing personnel, scientifically determine the nomination forms and procedures for selecting and appointing cadres, and gradually form a nomination system based on public opinion, with clear subjects, scientific procedures and clear responsibilities.

By increasing the competitiveness of competitive selection of cadres, by 2015, no less than 1/3 of the newly promoted party and government leading cadres appointed by the Bureau or below should be selected through competitive selection.

While continuing to do a good job of open selection for the public, we should further increase the competitive selection within the system, and take out a number of municipal and government leading cadres positions in the party and government organs and state-owned enterprises and institutions every year to conduct an open selection within the system.

The city will also improve the selection and training of cadres from the grassroots level.

By 2015, there will be more than half of the leading group members of municipal organs working in grass-roots leadership, and those with leading cadres at municipal level and department level will have more than 2/3 years of grass-roots work experience.

The township and district offices should be fully promoted to meet the requirements of the excellent Village (neighborhood) party organization secretaries, the directors of village (neighborhood) committees, and the college graduates who come to the villages to recruit civil servants.

We will continue to work in the field of exchange between municipal organs and district and county level cadres, and select outstanding young cadres to go to Xinjiang, Tibet, Qinghai, Yunnan and other supporting areas to be tested and exercised.

We should improve the comprehensive examination and evaluation method for promoting scientific development, and further improve and improve the multidimensional evaluation and assessment methods that involve multiple participation, comprehensive evaluation, qualitative and quantitative analysis.

At the same time, we should adhere to the declaration system of personal important matters for the proposed cadres, establish a cadre work information disclosure system, and strengthen the supervision of cadres' work.