Prada'S Embarrassment

In the 2005 movie "the devil wears Prada," Merrill Streep (Meryl Streep) plays the role of

The editor in chief is extremely strict in dressing the staff.

In the first three minutes of entering the office every day, employees will spontaneously pull up the fashion alarm: everyone is in panic and began to make up their makeup.

There may be problems in the whole body with fear. In the last second, the hair that is raised on the top of the head can be smoothed. Any fashion loophole may be discriminated against or even lose its job.

There is a widespread "discrimination" phenomenon in the fashion industry, which is very small in size, color and racial discrimination.

Perhaps we can see that the fashion magazines' employees are just as happy as if they are enemies, but honestly, if you want to be fashionable people, how to eat to keep fit should be a required course for you to enter this circle.

Karl Lage Karl (Lagerfeld) has made it clear that fashion circles cast aside all the fat people.

But when the cruel laughs in these movies are in life, are you still smiling?

This time, the protagonist who was involved in discrimination and dismissal was Prada, and the scene of the scene was moved to Hongkong.

This Italy fashion brand was originally made by

The creation of his grandfather, now under the management of muscia, has become increasingly prosperous.

The leader of the game has even represented fashion itself on some occasions.

Just as the brand is threatening to appear on the stock market in Hongkong, dozens of women have been protesting on the grounds that Prada, a top management officer in Hongkong, has been discriminated against because of "appearance".

The cause of the incident was in 2009, when Hongkong retail manager Rinna Boris (Rina Bovrisse) was dismissed by the brand.

In 2010, she brought up an accusation.

Japan's CEO David Sesia (Davide Sesia) had asked Reina to dismiss 30 members of the retail team that Dafydd thought were "overweight or not attractive". After being rejected by Raina, Dafydd dismissed her.

In a statement, she pointed out that Dafydd had asked her to lose weight and change her hairstyle to match the brand image.

One side's positive feedback and counterclaim against Rana's charges are totally false. At present, the two cases are still being tried.

When things go to this point, it seems that the right and wrong should be handed over to the court.

Since the beginning of last year, there has been a boom in the Hongkong listing event, which once again provided a stage for feminists.

Speak up

The issue of listing in Hongkong is also worth mentioning.

As a base

The Italy brand of genuine ancestry was first selected on the other side of the globe in Hongkong.

The growth of the battleground.

Some media broke the news.

In the first nine months of 2010, net profit increased by three times to 156 million euros, mainly thanks to the surge in sales in the Asian market.

Under favorable market conditions, the market value of Prada can reach 5 billion to 6 billion euros.

Due to market changes, Prada has at least missed three opportunities to list.

It will probably be the first European fashion company to be listed on the Hongkong stock exchange, and there is no Italy fashion company listed in Hongkong.

In this incident, feminists gathered at the Prada branch of Tsim Sha Tsui to protest against the Hongkong stock exchange's veto of Prada's IPO.

Sally Choi, a spokesman for the group of feminist protesters, said that it had sent a formal letter to the Hongkong stock exchange and also to Sari Cai.

The incumbent CEO Patrizio Bertelli sent an email.

The letter sent to the Hongkong stock exchange was posted on the Internet.

The practice of discriminating against female employees is a great shock.

A company should have strict, fair and impartial rules and regulations, and Prada obviously lacks the quality of this aspect. It has excessive demands on the external appearance of its female employees, as well as sexual harassment.

We are very concerned about the management system of this company.

We believe that the Hongkong stock exchange has the right to investigate and assess whether the sex discrimination behavior of employees coming to the listed company is true. If the situation is true, it has the right to prevent its listing in Hongkong.

The group said that if the exchange ignored their views, they would continue to protest.

Although it is obvious that their stance is almost impossible to prevent Prada from continuing to push ahead in the Chinese market to break more retail records.

In fact, it is not difficult to understand the requirements of the fashion brand for the image of the employees, but when the contradiction is directed toward intensification, or even finally stepped on the "firing device" of firing, the nature of the whole event will change.

Finally, whether or not the big hat of "discrimination" will be firmly fasten on Prada, this incident is still an embarrassing scene for Prada to hide in the crucial moment of the Chinese market.