London Fashion Week Has Been Criticized For Not Being "New".

London

Always famous for novelty and strangely.

The performance of designers this season is a big surprise.

The editor of New York magazine made the following comments: last season there were Pac Man helmets and MIA dresses.

But this season is too ordinary.

These clothes are perfect and nice, but they are not what we expected in London.

How did London Fashion Week become serious?

Models in London Fashion Week

In the past few quarters, the loss of talent in London may also make London want to join.

Paris and Milan.

Preen and Jonathan Saunders moved to New York, and Gareth Pugh moved to Paris.

But it is Pugh's kind of visual stimulation that attracts the editors' attention.

Good looks are good, but what's the fun?

Where is creativity?

Giles is a nice series, but we miss the awkwardness of Pac Man.

There is a deeper reason behind the mediocre London Fashion Week, which is the depressed economic environment.

Before the fashion week in New York, the sound we heard was to wear good clothes.

Designers in New York ignored these noises and still designed clothes according to their wishes.

London seems to be the other way round.

Some designers feel more pressure to launch a series that is easier to sell.

However, if their series is sold, and these series are very different from their design sense, how can they erect the past grotesque flag when the economic crisis is over?

People like it.

It is because London presents beautiful but interesting and clumsy clothes.

Maturity is not boring.