Clothing Quality Events Happen Frequently &Nbsp; Who Exactly Is The Problem?

During the period of "June 1", the Quality Supervision Bureau of the Municipal Bureau of quality inspection carried out tests on children's clothing and other children's products, of which only 77.4% of children's clothing was qualified.

This means that if all of these products can be sold, 22.6% of the children will be potentially harming.

During children's day, children's clothing, toys and so on are hot selling products. In order to effectively grasp the quality of the products of the market and correctly guide consumption, the Bureau conducted supervision and spot checks on the quality of four kinds of children's products, including baby diapers, toys, baby carriages and children's clothing, and the passing rate of physical quality was 100%, 100%, 50% and 77.4% respectively. There are two batches of children's car checks, one of which is a plastic bag that is thinner than the standard required. It is dangerous for children to cover their mouth and nose when they misuse it.

Children's clothing has been sampled for 62 batches, in kind. quality The pass rate increased by 7.7% and 31.9% respectively compared with that in 2010 and 2009. The main unqualified items were fiber content and pH value. No banned azo dyes and formaldehyde exceeded the standard. Spot checks in recent years have shown that the quality of children's clothing has improved significantly, but the overall quality level is still not high.

Household textiles (including pajamas, underwear, etc.) and bedclothes and other two kinds of textiles were sampled 50 or 24 batches respectively, and the qualified rate of physical objects was 76% and 70.8%. The main unqualified items of household clothing products are fiber content and pH value. The main items of unqualified items for bedding are pH value, color fastness to rubbing, and washing size change rate.

This reminiscent of ZARA's deep fall in quality gate.

In April 10th, one came from 57 kinds, namely, the association of consumer goods and the national clothing quality supervision and inspection center. Casual pants The results of the comparison test put ZARA on the cusp: fiber content, color fastness and other indicators are not qualified, and this is the seventh time since August 2009, ZARA has boarded the "black list" because of quality problems.

Since 2009, the market association has conducted three clothing products comparative tests in accordance with the law on the ZARA products sold by the SA business (or) company, and three times were identified by the quality inspection agency. Unqualified The association has informed the company three times and released the test results to the public. However, the company has not been given a clear response and statement.

In December 21, 2009, the China Association of trade unions commissioned the textile and fur quality inspection center of China Merchants Association to conduct a comparative experiment on the down and down clothing market. The results showed that a coat from ZARA, which was marked with 50% down, contained only 40.5% of the measured cashmere content.

In January 30, 2010, according to the comparative test of 53 kinds of down coats and a coat coat, the Confederation of consumers and consumers showed that more than 30% products were unqualified, of which a ZARA priced 999 yuan jacket was 70% of eiderdown stuffed, with only 51.1% of the actual pile down.

In April 10, 2011, commissioned by the association of consumers and consumers, the national clothing quality supervision and Inspection Center (LC) detected 57 kinds of casual pants samples produced or distributed by 54 enterprises in nine provinces and cities, including ZARA, one, 54, 57, and so on. A pair of casual pants was tested for excellent fastness, and 3 items were not qualified for acid perspiration, alkali resistant sweat stains and moisture resistance. In addition, the tag had a nominal wool content of 20%, and its actual wool content was only 10.6%.

After the release of the test results, ZARA maintained a silent response and did not give any advice on the problem products. In April 21st, the association of consumers and consumers sent a letter to the SA business (H) company, which openly criticized the neglect of product quality and disregard of consumers' rights and interests. Many media reported it and aroused widespread concern from all walks of life.

In response to the criticism of Consumers Association, ZARA's Public Relations Department of INDITEX group finally issued a statement, saying that ZARA clothing meets all relevant Chinese health and safety regulations, and all chemical tests show that qualified 。 Among them, the inspection of color fastness, the statement said that ZARA clothing "meet the highest level of clothing standards in many testing categories", only two items did not meet the highest standards, but still achieved the quality of standard products. However, the problem of false marking of the actual components of the product is explained by the statement, because acrylic and fibrous glue components are not labelled on the product label. According to our regulations, such fibers should be labeled with "other fibers". The ZARA quality control department is revising this.

However, this statement did not respond to the quality problems of the two down garments in 2009 and 2010, nor did it explain the unreal contents of wool and cotton in casual trousers. As for how to deal with the problem products, the consumers did not mention the returns and did not apologize.

According to the statement that "ZARA's clothing meets the highest level of clothing standards in many testing categories, only two items do not meet the highest standards, but still meet the standard product quality standard", Tang Xiangtao, senior engineer of the national garment quality supervision and inspection center, said he did not agree with him. According to Tang Xiangtao, the quality of clothing is divided into three categories: superior, first-class and qualified products. The corresponding standards of different grades are different, and the values of inspection are also different. "Indicating that it is a first grade product, it must be tested according to the standard of first grade product, and all the requirements and testing items of the first grade product can not reach the standard of qualified products, which is also an unqualified product."

The Department of social supervision and consumer guidance, said the ZARA must have a clear attitude. The statement did not address the substantive issues of safeguarding the rights and interests of consumers, such as what measures should be taken to solve the quality problems, what relief measures should be taken to consumers who bought the products and so on.

The garments exported to China abroad must be examined through strict "standards" before they can be sold. However, many foreign brands entering the country conform to China's quality standards, but little attention has been paid to them.

For this ZARA "quality gate", some Spanish media have also reported accordingly. In the subtitle of "the low quality and the criticizing of the Spanish enterprise label" by the "low quality and the fake country", the ZARA thought that the problems that China began to encounter in the Chinese market may be to destroy the expansion plan of ZARA in China. The news also accuses China of being a big counterfeiting country. China is not only a result of the fact that the clothing products have been exposed all over the world due to inferior quality, but also include medicines and food.

While we are delighted with the achievements made by Chinese clothing in the domestic and foreign markets, we should also attach importance to the safety of clothing on ourselves and protect our right to know and to be safe as consumers. If the local clothing market develops well and healthfully, it will surely have a positive impact on the norms of foreign trade export and the position of China's consumer market.