A Garment Cannot Make A Country Prosperous.

National clothing: a garment can not flourish, nor can a garment lose its state.

about

It's been noisy again recently.

Hundreds of scholars advocated the Hanfu into the Olympic Games. The delegates asked for the national costume and academic costume, claiming that this could increase China's soft power.

The opponents are painful, but this is "to make people look stupid" (Lu Xun language); there is no purpose of economy and power; it will lead to a flood of extreme conservative ideology and destroy the modernization process of the country.

This is where they are!

I do not know that the adults and scholars of both sides have noticed the photos of Hanfu enthusiasts on the Internet: those young people are wearing Han clothes, with modern hairstyles, and some of them are dyed and haunting.

Some may be a joke, but this is the true face of the Hanfu revival movement.

I am not a Hanfu enthusiast, but I once met some Hanfu enthusiasts at the forum.

I know that most of these people tend to be nationalistic, but gentle.

They did not oppose democracy, rule of law, science, nor did they think about it.

Jeans are expelled from China.

They just think that we should treasure our own traditional culture in the process of learning from the West.

They are basically well-educated, well paid young people.

Hanfu is not mass produced, and one is not cheap.

It's a big misunderstanding to regard such people who are shopping on WAL-MART, listening to English songs and watching Hollywood movies as the red guards in Confucius's temple.

Do you think those MM who love stink really love three or four virtues?

The rapid expansion of Han Fu revival movement in the pure folk state shows that it has deep social and cultural psychological support behind it.

I do not know that those who openly claim that democracy is not the only choice of Neo Confucianism, but why do they regard themselves as the mentors of the Han Fu revival movement, do they really feel that people can be used and driven by interests?

I also don't know that those western scholars in the absence of actual understanding of Hanfu fans, why is arbitrary, this is a reaction of thought?

In fact, no matter what

Hanfu and Western-style clothes are all just clothes.

In the history of human civilization, like King Zhao Wuling's Hu Fu riding and shooting, changing a suit means a technological innovation, an anomaly.

In most cases, the three main functions of clothing are shelter, cold and stink.

A garment can not flourish, nor can a garment die.

Looking at the two big groups of adults and scholars, they are trying to speak in a big way, and as a spectator, I really feel bored.

It is the 54 period that strengthens the Chinese tradition that all things are fair.

When we read "Ah Q" and "Xiang Linsao", our teachers tell us that this reveals China's national character.

After growing up, I feel more and more that this is not the Chinese national character, but rather the common weakness of human nature.

When I read the information of the 54 period, I sometimes think of this question: if Yuan Shikai did not become emperor, would 54 still happen?

Or will 54 appear in such an exciting way?

In fact, at the beginning of the Republic, the average annual growth rate of China's industry had reached 13.4%, and the country still had the opportunity.

If Yuan Shikai's lard had been hardened to become an emperor and led to the collapse of the constitutional government, Lu Xun might have been a good civil servant instead of being the standard bearer of the new culture movement.

How fortunate is this to the country?

Or is it unfortunate?

Of course, I have no intention of negating the great achievements of the 54 sages in culture. But facts have proved that political problems must be solved by political means, and economic problems must be solved by economic means.

"Long live the emperor", though it is gone, "the long live of Chiang Kai Shek" and so on.

Back to Hanfu itself, the best attitude to this question is still a matter of fact.

What steps should it take to improve it?

Or simply abandon the old system and redesign it with cultural elements?

To politicize it is a heavy burden that this garment can not bear. It will only alienate and dispel the positive significance of the matter itself.

From this point of view, the real people of Han Fu and the merchants who want to earn money from the rejuvenation of the Han Dynasty are the most opposed to the new Confucianism.

They use their discourse advantages to manipulate this sport.