Sample Survey Of 6000 Enterprises: Business Environment Retrogression Until 2008

Since the financial crisis in 2008, is China's business environment better or worse?

In November 22nd, Fang Gang, director of the National Economic Research Institute of the China economic reform research foundation, provided a data reference on the research report published at the annual meeting of Chinese enterprise competitiveness in 2011.

This tracking business environment survey involving more than 6000 enterprises in the past more than 10 years shows that in 2010, 7 aspects of Chinese enterprises' operating environment, apart from "intermediary organizations and technical services" and "corporate social environment" two evaluations, were slightly better than those in 2008.

It is worth noting that in the 2010 score, small businesses and medium-sized enterprises

Fang Gang said that reducing micro intervention in the local government, improving the relationship between the government and the market and improving the relationship between the government and enterprises should be an important direction of China's economic restructuring.

Li Yang, vice president of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and deputy director of the development research center of the State Council Liu Shijin also called for the next stage to break the monopoly as soon as possible, and promote private enterprises to enter the urban infrastructure, affordable housing construction and other service industries, and develop a multi-level capital market (including the OTC market) to provide support for small business financing services.

Enterprise management environment retrogression

According to the above research results released by Fang Gang, in 2010 compared with 2008, 5 of the 7 sub categories of Chinese enterprises' operating environment regressed.

In the 2010 business environment evaluation, the most backward score was the "infrastructure condition", with a score of 3.19, while the score in 2008 was 3.57.

The difference between the two groups is "the legal environment for business operation". The score in 2010 was 3.24 in 3.12008 years.

In addition, the scores of "human resources supply", "financial services" and "government administration" also declined slightly.

In contrast, in 2008, the scores of the 7 projects mentioned above were significantly higher than those in 2006, indicating that the business environment improved significantly from 2006 to 2008.

But in 2010, there was a considerable regression.

Fang Gang pointed out that before 2008, financial services and other aspects were improved, and the subjective evaluation of enterprises declined in 2010, which was related to the changes in the domestic and international economic situation.

In addition, 90% of SMEs surveyed in 2010 were SMEs.

The research report not only carried out a longitudinal comparison, but also conducted a horizontal comparison of the business environment of each province.

The data of 2006, 2008 and 2010 show that the main business environment assessment is the developed coastal provinces in East China, and Shanghai has always been the top priority.

The top five in 2010 were Shanghai, Jiangsu, Tianjin, Zhejiang and Beijing.

In addition to Chongqing, the central and western regions increased significantly (ranked eleventh in 2010, seventeenth in 2008 and twentieth in 2006). Most of the provinces ranked behind, and the progress was not obvious.

Fang Gang suggested that if the state wants to improve the competitiveness of enterprises, it needs to relax its policy. Local governments should also think about how we can improve in all aspects, reform our system, adjust our policies, clean up our policies, reduce local micro interference, improve government services to enterprises, improve the complex system environment, and make our enterprises better.

Government "micro intervention" urgently needs to exit

"Calls on the government to conscientiously clean up and thoroughly clean up the so-called" micro intervention "these problems.

Fang Gang suggested that the next stage should break the monopoly as soon as possible and open the market to private enterprises as soon as possible.

According to the reporter's understanding, the above research contents on "government administration" relate to "excessive intervention by local governments to enterprises", "excessive market access restrictions", "law enforcement efficiency of administrative law enforcement agencies (business, taxation, quality inspection)", "the proportion of enterprises' fund-raising, apportionment or other non tax paying equivalent to the sales revenue of enterprises", and the specific contents of "the time proportion between business operators and government departments and their staff".

And whether the government can release control to enable SMEs and private enterprises to develop as soon as possible will be related to the rapid upgrading of competitiveness of Chinese enterprises.

According to the statistics, more than 50 enterprises in the mainland of China have entered the top 500 of the world. These enterprises are relatively concentrated in the monopoly and basic industries, most of them are central enterprises.

Liu Shijin pointed out that this is similar to Brazil, Mexico and other countries.

Because the monopoly industries have not been released, the private and small and medium-sized enterprises have not developed well, leading to the fact that per capita GDP can not enter the ranks of high-income countries.

In Japan, Korea and other countries, the per capita GDP has entered the ranks of high-income countries, benefiting from the growth of its private enterprises.

Therefore, Liu Shijin suggested that the next step should be relaxed access, encourage industrial competition, promote efficiency upgrading and industrial upgrading.

In particular, relaxing access and encouraging competition in basic industries and services should be the focus of next reform and strive to achieve substantial progress in a relatively early period.

Li Yang, vice president of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, believes that China's infrastructure and affordable housing investment is mainly dependent on government and bank funds, and is still the way of financing platform, which is easy to form bad debts.

To this end, we need to actively promote private enterprises to enter the field of urban infrastructure and affordable housing construction, and solve the problem of local financing platform debt by means of marketization.

We should develop multi-level capital market and serve the financing of small and medium-sized enterprises.