Textile Enterprises Do Not Deal With Pollution Effectively; &Nbsp, Lining And Other Famous Enterprises Have Been Questioned.

In the afternoon of April 9th, 5 environmental protection organizations jointly issued a research report on "cleaning for fashion - green choice of textile brand supply chain pollution".

According to the financial reports published by the listed companies of textile printing and dyeing enterprises, reporters generally did not disclose environmental accounting information.

For example, in the 2007 annual report of the Shijiazhuang Changshan textile Limited by Share Ltd, though referring to the links of reducing consumption and reducing pollution and promoting new technologies and new equipment, there was no clear announcement on specific inputs.

At present, the cost accounting of textile printing and dyeing enterprises almost does not take into account the problem of environmental pollution. In addition to accounting for the mandatory fee collection fees and related staff salaries and benefits, the resources consumption cost, environmental protection cost and related management cost of enterprises are not fully considered.

Sky high advertising input

Brand image is destroyed by pollution.

In this pollution blacklist, Lining is a famous local sports brand.

According to the 2011 Annual Report released by Lining, the total distribution cost of Lining last year was 2 billion 900 million yuan, up 13% from 2 billion 500 million in 2010, accounting for 32.6% of total revenue.

According to another data, Lining achieved 8 billion 929 million yuan in operating income throughout the year, a decrease of nearly 500 million yuan from last year, and no increase of 5.8% in revenue.

At the same time, gross margin dropped by 8.02 percentage points to 46.1%.

In this case, Lining has been insisting on his own brand image publicity, the harvest has been decreasing, but the cost has not been effectively controlled.

The report shows that the total cost of distribution and administrative expenses increased by 3% to 3 billion 223 million yuan over the previous year.

The cost of Lining advertising and related promotion was 1 billion 400 million yuan, an increase of 10.8% over the same period last year, representing an increase of 2.7% in the proportion of revenue.

Compared with the 1 billion 400 million yuan high advertising input, Lining's investment in pollution control is negligible.

After the press conference in April 9th, Ma Jun, director of the public and environmental information research center, told the China enterprise daily that in the survey, we found that a large number of textile enterprises exceeding the standard violating regulations were large international and domestic.

The headquarters of Futian industries (Group) Co., Ltd. is located in Hongkong and listed on The Stock Exchange of HongKong Limited (Hongkong stock exchange No. 420), with production facilities in China, Sri Lanka and Indonesia. Overseas marketing offices / representative offices are distributed in 5 countries, employing 14200 employees around the world.

The group provides fabrics for garment manufacturers in over 40 countries to make international famous brand ready-made garments.

The global sales volume of the group in 2011 fiscal year amounted to HK $7 billion 600 million (US $975 million).

As early as in 2006, Dongguan Fu'an textile printing and dyeing Co., Ltd., a subsidiary of Futian industries (Group) Co., Ltd. (FOUNTAIN SET 420), which was listed in Hongkong, was investigated and dealt with for stealing and printing printing and dyeing wastewater secretly.

Futian industrial group is another subsidiary company in Dongguan, Guangdong, Dongguan, Sha Tin.

A number of bad environmental records of the company are also included in the pollution map database.

In April 12, 2011, the environmental protection department of Guangdong province publicized the results of the environmental protection credit rating of key pollution sources in Guangdong Province in 2010.

{page_break}

Ma Jun introduced that according to the relevant evaluation standards of the former environmental protection administration, red represents the difference, which means that the enterprises have made efforts to control pollution, but have not reached the national or local pollutant discharge standards, or have had general or large environmental events. The black representatives are very poor, which means that the pollutants discharged by enterprises are seriously exceeding the standard or exceeding the standard many times, causing serious environmental impacts, important environmental violations or major or especially serious environmental incidents.

Through the search, we found that many textile enterprises were rated as local red or black brands, indicating that they were the important sources of pollution.

The textile industry is a big drain.

How to effectively control pollution

In 2010, the total fiber processing in China's textile industry amounted to 41 million 300 thousand tons, accounting for 52% to 54% of the world's total.

Meanwhile, in 2010, the total export volume of China's textiles and clothing reached 212 billion US dollars, accounting for 34% of the world's total exports.

In order to prevent water pollution from textile and other industries, China has implemented relevant environmental regulations. However, inadequate supervision resources and weak enforcement of local protection have made textile factories lack the power to comply with these norms.

Even if law enforcement is in place, it is often difficult to stop duplication of illegal activities in factories.

According to the above research report, the textile industry is one of the largest sources of water pollution in China.

Its wastewater discharge intensity is high, and the reuse water rate is very low.

Chinese textiles

Over the years, China's environmental statistics show that textile industry is a major pollutant exporters in key industries.

The textile industry includes cotton textile, yarn dyed, woolen knitted, linen textile, silk, chemical fiber, printing and dyeing, knitting and garment industries. Water pollution is the biggest environmental problem in the textile industry.

Dyeing and finishing wastewater accounts for 80% of the total textile wastewater discharge.

The total amount of dyeing and finishing wastewater in 5 provinces of Zhejiang, Jiangsu, Shandong, Guangdong and Fujian accounts for 90% of the total dyeing and finishing wastewater in China.

According to Ma Jun, traditional printing and dyeing processes produce a large amount of toxic sewage. After processing, some toxic dyes or processing aids on the waste water have a direct impact on human health.

Such as azo dyes, formaldehyde, fluorescent whitening agents and softeners are allergenic; polyvinyl alcohol and polypropylene size are not easily biodegradable; chlorine bleaching agents are heavily polluted; some aromatic amine dyes are carcinogenic; dyes are harmful to heavy metals; formaldehyde containing various finishing agents and printing auxiliaries are toxic to human body.

In 2012, Greenpeace released the report of "fashion poison 3". It pointed out that the toxic and harmful substances NPE (nonylphenol ethoxylates) on many international and domestic brand clothing products will be released in large quantities during washing process, then be discharged into rivers, lakes and oceans, and pformed into a more toxic chemical substance that interferes with endocrine system NP (Ren Jifen).

If the waste water is not treated or treated, it will not be discharged directly after the prescribed discharge standard. The decomposition of these organic components will consume all the oxygen in the water, causing the fish and shrimp to die in batches, until the river becomes a stagnant pool, which seriously destroys the water body, sediment and its ecosystem.

What are the good suggestions for textile enterprises to invest in pollution control while creating brand marketing cards?

Secondly, we should enhance the level of processing technology, adopt advanced, mature and stable technology to ensure the treatment effect, and finally, enhance the flexibility of the system operation. It is convenient to manage sewage treatment links and reduce the intensity of operational labor, thereby reducing the expenditure to a certain extent.