The American Olympic Uniform Is Not A Simple Political Farce.

"

"The future will not only face more and more market barriers such as anti-dumping and countervailing, but also may face more and more political barriers such as" burning up American uniforms ". This time," burning China made "will not be realized because of the opening of the Olympic Games, but next time it may become ugly but unmerciless reality.

With the opening of London Olympic Games, athletes from various countries are actively preparing for war, but the US Olympic delegation is beset by a topic outside the sport. Marking the opening ceremony of the "London made Olympic Games" shirt made in China, some American politicians are losing their temper. The majority leader of the United States Senate Reed even claimed that they should burn the Olympic uniforms and remake them by the American textile mill.

It is a pity that no country can fulfill Reed's task in a very short time before the opening of the Olympic Games unless it is entrusted to China again.

So American athletes still need to wear Chinese made uniforms to enter the London arena.

But under the pressure of US Congressmen, the US Olympic Committee locked the American uniform of the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympic Games as "made in the United States".

The US Olympic Committee's order, the US company's contract, the design, the processing and production of Chinese companies, the international division of labor that is more classic in the era of globalization, is puzzled by the fact that the United States has suffered such a rebound and boycott in the United States, the biggest promoter and beneficiary of globalization.

But from another point of view, the globalization division of labor helps us high-tech industry and financial services industry get excess profits, but also makes us manufacturing industry completely lose its comparative advantage and move outward.

Once faced with the impact of the financial crisis, the beautiful and fragile shell is difficult to provide full support for the US economy, and to revive the "made in the United States" and the real economy, it has become an inevitable choice to get out of the crisis.

Under such circumstances, the Chinese workers, who had been cheated by the American chiefs and even the general consumers with unimaginable cheap and forbearance, even became Chinese workers who boarded the "times" cover as "annual figures", but were gradually being deducted by American politicians as clowns who deprived American workers of their jobs.

Someone burned Reed and others.

The motion is seen as an election farce before the US general election.

But it is important to note that without the above era background, if the ordinary American people are still immersed in the cheap and beautiful life created by China for their "manufacture", politicians will not want to vote for themselves by attacking China.

Therefore, behind the seemingly absurd farce, there are inevitable realistic interests.

Chinese manufacturing is bound to be increasingly adopted by politicians in the United States and other western countries as a political issue, and may be gradually rejected by consumers in western countries.

Especially when China's labor costs gradually increase, while American workers gradually learn to accept the reality under the pressure of economic crisis, the labor cost advantage of "made in China" will no longer be so significant to be irreplaceable.

Especially when the United States' capital advantage, technological advantage, management advantage, market advantage and American style patriotism mobilization are integrated together, "made in the United States" may have certain comparative advantages and become an option that can be considered.

In fact, more and more American companies have begun to consider moving their manufacturing industries back to the United States and have begun to move. For example, Google's newly developed Nexus Q player, such as general electric assembly, has moved back to the United States.

Therefore, the "made in China" future will not only face more and more market barriers such as anti-dumping and countervailing, but also face more and more political barriers such as "burning American uniforms". This time, the "burning China made" will be faced with.

If the opening is not achieved, the next time it will become an ugly but unmerciless reality.

In addition, we need to face the increasing competition of "made in America" and "made in Europe".

Fortunately, more and more Chinese enterprises have begun to get rid of the bottom role of the economic chain and gradually develop to the middle and high end of the economic chain, so that their enterprises can get a comparative advantage at a higher level.

This is not only an inevitable choice for these enterprises, but also an inevitable choice for China's economy.