Ji'Nan Parkson 1590 Yuan Women'S Clothing Is Accused Of Being A Cat

In Parkson

Kang Clothing Co., Ltd. "put Dove".

In July 18th, Ji Wanchang was fully commissioned by a consumer to report to the party hotline.

On the "dove incident" incident, Ji'nan Baisheng Commercial Co., Ltd., responsible person, Ms. Lin said that the factory staff did not schedule, so missed the joint inspection, and then will contact the factory about Ji Wanchang.

In July 22nd, Ji Wanchang said that Parkson and garment manufacturers in Ji'nan only said that the incident was still being processed and that no consensus had yet been reached.

In addition, Ji'nan Parkson promised to send a fax to the reporter about the quality inspection report that Ji Wanchang had shown before. After that, he changed the name to let reporters read to Parkson personally. In July 22nd, he changed his name to reporters and Ji Wanchang at the same time to see the quality inspection report.

Controversy exists

Both sides have quality inspection reports disagree with each other.

Around 10:30 in July 18th, in an interview with Ji Wanchang, in May 9th, his client bought a gold sleeveless woman's coat from Ji'nan Parkson for 1590 yuan, and the tag was marked with "HFBELLO".

Before the dress was worn, the client found that there was something wrong with the fabric.

After thinking about a week or so, she found Ji Wanchang, who frequently defended false rights, and gave him full power to deal with the matter.

In May 25th, Ji Wanchang sent his clothes to the product quality supervision and Inspection Institute of Ji'nan.

It is reported that the garment produced by Beijing King Swiss Garments Co. Ltd. of Yongkang is "not up to the standard requirement and the sample is not qualified".

The data on the attached page of the test report show that the net fabric content of the fabric should be: mulberry silk 75%, up and down can float 5%, polyester fiber 25%, up and down can float 5%.

The results of actual detection are: mulberry silk 62.5% and polyester fiber 37.5%.

The single item is "unqualified".

Ji Wanchang thought, "the cost price of mulberry silk is the same as that of polyester fiber, which is a shoddy way to deceive consumers."

At the beginning of June, Ji wan chang asked Ji'nan Parkson to return compensation and apologized to his client for being rejected by the test report.

He said, "they are too angry to use four words to describe prevarication."

According to the state regulations, products can not be sold on the market without being inspected.

Ji Wanchang asked Ji'nan Parkson to produce the product quality inspection report. As a result, Ji'nan Baisheng presented a fabric report.

Ji Wanchang believes that the Ji'nan Parkson business range is not to sell cloth, but to sell clothes, fabric report does not represent clothing.

He said, "Ji'nan Parkson can allow manufacturers to take a qualified fabric for testing, but it does not represent the fabric that the clothes are made of."

After that, Baisheng, Ji'nan, produced a report on the quality inspection of ready-made garments, but Ji Wanchang said it was on the early June.

"Obviously it is because we are chasing the manufacturers to do the test report. There is no quality inspection report before sale.

But the problems still remain the same. They do not test the same clothes.

So we do not agree with each other's test results.

Ji Wanchang said.

{page_break}

Comparative rights protection

Beijing agencies re examination by "Dove"

"Really can not fake, really false."

Ji Wanchang said, "I want to work together with the manufacturers to appoint an authority testing agency to do a re examination of this dress in my hand.

If the inspection proves that the clothes are qualified, I would like to publicly apologize to Ji'nan Parkson and Beijing Jing Rui Yongkang Garments Co., Ltd.

If unqualified, do other treatment.

The other side agreed, but put me in dove. "

At that time, Ji wan chang first put forward that the Shandong Fiber Inspection Bureau was relatively authoritative and could jointly do the testing, and the manufacturer refused.

"They want me to go anywhere in Beijing and find any testing agency.

So I looked for the national cotton textile product quality supervision and inspection center, and I went there, and waited for two days.

I called Ji'nan Parkson, Ji'nan Parkson said that manufacturers are reluctant.

For Ji Wanchang said to Beijing to do quality inspection is "put Dove", Ji'nan Baisheng, a person in charge of Ms. Lin has another argument, she said, manufacturers do not agree to do joint testing, but Ji Wanchang did not have a good appointment with the manufacturer before going to Beijing, the manufacturer is responsible for this matter personnel schedule is just not appropriate.

The manufacturer asked Ji Wanchang to test himself first, but the testing agency said that both sides must be present to make the test, and Ji wan chang only stayed in Beijing for two days, so he missed it.

She promised that Ji'nan Parkson would also contact the manufacturers as soon as possible.

Why should manufacturers choose Beijing's testing agency? Ms. Lin explains that the factory's fabric and production plants are in Beijing, and manufacturers feel that Beijing's testing institutions are very authoritative.

Ms. Lin also said that if the final test result proves that the product is defective, we will also punish the supplier.

In addition, she also said that the qualification of the supplier is no problem. When the goods were stationed in Ji'nan Parkson, they all had quality inspection reports.

She also said that she would later send the fax to the journalist in charge of all quality inspection reports.

{page_break}

Ji'nan Baisheng

The reporter saw different reports.

Ji Wanchang maintains his power so far, he feels he has been dragged, Ji'nan Baisheng and manufacturers sometimes ignore him.

"To say responsibility, Ji'nan Parkson is duty bound, and can not be pushed to the manufacturers.

You know, the tag on the clothes is not random data, it is tagged according to the test report.

Ji'nan Parkson should have the responsibility to check before buying. It must see the quality inspection report before purchasing.

Look at the attitude of Ji'nan Parkson, and push the problem to the manufacturers.

But consumers spent money on Parkson in Ji'nan, instead of giving it directly to manufacturers. The chapter on the invoice is Ji'nan Baisheng commercial limited, not the manufacturer's name.

Ji Wanchang also said, "if we buy foreign products, according to Parkson in Ji'nan, is it necessary for consumers to go abroad to protect their rights?"

Reporters contacted Beijing Jing Rui Yongkang Garments Co., Ltd., whose staff members said they knew the person in charge of the matter was on a business trip and came back several days later.

The reporter asked to contact the person in charge of the phone, the other side said that telephone contact is afraid to disturb the work of this person in charge.

Ms. Lin, Parkson of Ji'nan, told reporters after some coordination. The head of the ladies' clothing department believed that the fax of the evidence was not suitable for electronic pmission, and hoped that reporters would go to Ji'nan Baisheng personally to check it.

In July 22nd, Ji Wanchang said that Ji'nan Parkson contacted garment manufacturers and said that it was coordinating with the manufacturers. After that, there was no definite response to Ji wan chang.

At 16:53 on the 22 th, Ms. Lin, director of Parkson, Ji'nan, told reporters on the phone that the quality inspection report provided by the factory had been read by Ji wan chang before, and it would not be read to reporters alone. "It's not good to look at the media unilaterally, because the media is not the Party of the incident.

If Ji Wanchang, a reporter with a good client, goes to Parkson in Ji'nan, he can produce relevant evidence.

If we feel that all parties are at the scene, the effect of showing evidence is the best. "

Ms. Lin said, "we have agreed a time limit with Mr. Ji to solve this problem."

The reporter asked how long the time limit would be, Ms. Lin said. "Let's introduce Mr. Ji to you later."

At 17:06 on the 22 th, Ji Wanchang, who is on a business trip in Shenyang, said that she would probably return to Ji'nan in July 26th and would be willing to show her evidence to reporters with Parkson and clothing manufacturers in Ji'nan.